![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
"ON GUARD"
Looks Nigel is in a spot of trouble... Quote:
Tell you what this should put some life into this boring election. :DL Moving on to my area I see the Cons/Lab/UKIP candidates for the GE are now posted. |
Quote:
Hence "Increase spending on public services even if it means the deficit isn't eliminated by 2020" has a rating of 6.3, fairly important, whilst "Eliminate the deficit by the end of the next parliament in 2020 even if it means reducing spending on public services" has a rating of 4.6, much less important. Hence the comment that Scots would rather see higher public spending and aren't that concerned about the deficit. Or at least the 1000 or so who were surveyed thought that way.:hmmm: Mike. |
Quote:
|
I must admit I was pleasantly surprised at the UKIP manifesto this morning.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2015-32313965 Policy guide: Where the parties stand. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2015/manifesto-guide |
I shall be reading all the manifesto's over the weekend online and seeing which party suits me. All I will say the chances of me voting Tory are not good.
|
Quote:
http://shouldyouvoteukip.tumblr.com/...t-so-bad#notes |
Quote:
|
I have been told I missed the funny high light of the campaign so far, Cameron eating a hot dog with a silver knife and fork. :haha:
My only regret is I missed that. :/\\!! Any how moving on, I have been out and about today and I noticed something and that something was not one party poster in the window not one party poll in a garden not one bill board poster. Too sum up a big fat zero unlike back in 2010 when you could not miss seeing these. Whats your area like where you live? |
Quote:
Rather odd really considering this will be the first election my wife has voted in, and the first in a long while that my mother will vote in, although she's doing it through proxy via me since she can't get to the polling station. |
Quote:
Nothing here at all although one chap was flying a Union flag yesterday - I was wondering why but I now suspect it was for the release of a (Unionist) manifesto (UKIP's perhaps?). Or was there a royal birth or something? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I haven't even seen any canvassers at all, either, though that might change nearer the date.:hmmm: Mike. |
Quote:
However, too many snouts in troughs, methinks. I'd actually make a complete change and have a completely new location for an English Parliament. Perhaps a clean break is what's needed, especially considering the state of the current building.:hmmm: I keep seeing either Winchester or York being mentioned. Mike.:) |
Quote:
It might help bring some prosperity north. On the other hand, perhaps a complete break might be better. |
The SNP were on fire tonight, Farage was smashed into the dirt by the ladies and Ed...god bless him, he tried, but the show was not being run by him.
I tell you, if I were north of the border, my vote would definitely be heading towards the SNP, such a strong performance not seen in a very long time. Ed's utter refusal to entertain an SNP alliance is odd though, I think that behind the scenes he's probably either already negotiating one...or perhaps, he's putting in bids for what'll be left of the Lib Dems. Not sure that'll be enough though. There's one more debate to be had in a couple of weeks and that's a BBC Question Time panel with Clegg, Milliband and Cameron, that will be interesting to see. And an interesting aside for the night. Part way through the debate I made a tweet which stated that I wished I lived in Scotland so I could vote SNP, because Sturgeon was on fire and that tweet has since been retweeted nearly a hundred times and favourited over fifty. I opposed the break-up of the Union, and I still do, but the SNP has done a fantastic job in the debates, as have Plaid Cymru that I feel that it would be unfair for them not to be rewarded. As it stands, I must admit, my voting choice has wavered a bit from Labour towards Green...I'm going to have to do some soul searching about Trident I think... :hmmm: |
Well, the SNP have been doing quite a good job in Holyrood (also, Holyrood is more congenial, I think, to working with other parties) and now that the referendum has given an answer it's possible to vote for them without worrying about a break-up. Sturgeon is rather good.
Ed, I think, has to look like he's defending Labour's candidates in Scotland so cannot really say out loud "alright, we'll work with you": plus we've seen the papers and articles where "SNP MPs should not get to vote", "The Thames will run red with blood if the SNP prop up Labour", etc., so I would guess (just a guess) that he's a bit worried about a back-lash in England. Your tweet (and several others) makes me think that this might be a worry he can ignore. Interesting times, though. If I lived in England I would not know who to vote for. |
If the snp do very well in scotland which im sure they will, it wont be long before they push for another referendum. This is definately a danger for the uk as a whole especially if they have ed by the delicates.
|
Quote:
:) |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.