![]() |
Sh4 is ok, but performance for me drops about 100FPS in sh4, im getting 180+ fps with the 16km environments, and 200+ FPS (sometimes around 300. FPS) without.:o
|
Quote:
Maybe by better graphics people are assuming you turn on/off various items, or install certain mods that improve the ocean. ...or maybe it's the real 3D damage modelling? I just don't see where the "cartoon" label fits (even in the stock version). ...and I'm a long time SH3/GWX fan. I'm only playing the stock SH4 at the moment and I would agree that the sky and ocean looks a little goofy. But I haven't seen anything (yet) that warrants a "cartoon" label. I assume I can fix the ocean/sky with a mod or two... |
SH4 Water in the beginning ( early stock ) was just fair, especially storm conditions, but modders have done wonders with it.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...145744_140.jpg RDP |
Wow :o
|
W............!!!!!!
:o :o Jesus!!!!!!!!:o :o
:o What a sea!!!! :o :oops: |
I had bought a disk of SH4 just about the moment when it first came out. I loaded it in and had some pretty good frame rates, yet it looked very filtered over, almost hazey/pixellated (not speaking of in-game effects settings) to the point that it felt very "distant" to interact with. So, I had uninstalled SH4 soon after. Back to SH3/GWX3 & loving it all.
Just this past weekend, I had decided to make an adjustment to my system & give SH4 another install and try. Along the way I had heard for a while that ATI cards often suffer from the effects of their own Catalyst Control Center. So, with this potential problem in mind, I went ahead and cleaned out the CCC from my system. Following a registry clean, I re-installed my old SH4, defragged disk, etc. WOW! ~ :D :up: ;) I am bound for the Pacific fleet! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Thanks mookie, I will take a look at that thread.
I have a nice, super crisp view and gameplay already since my ATI CCC adjustment/removal. I will look forward to adding PE4, etc., very soon. As far as that SH4 post-process checkbox goes, that's just too much effect fuss for real patrols. |
Cartoony?
http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q...201647_531.jpg The crew looks cartoony. I can't argue there. Everything else that has been modded...you tell me how this pic looks. I do not spend my time looking at my crew so the cartoon guys don't matter to me. They do look better than the chiseled crew in SH3. Just a matter of taste I guess. http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q...185339_968.jpg |
AVGWarhawk
:o The sea where your ship breaking in half , are still looking ugly :o Sorry.
No seas shining like that :huh: :-? In the 2nd picture the sea looks like oilpainting , terrible .:nope: :nope: I can't understand and figure out , what ubisoft was thinking , when they make the SH4 :stare: :-? Sorry , but the sea look really strange . I live by the sea in Norway , and it sure doesn't look like that:shifty: I'm not convinced:roll: |
StarLion, just google water+sun and look at some of the pics. The Norvegian water might be different, but the water elsewhere sure seems to do that.
http://www.imagekandi.com/photo/imag...-The-Water.jpg |
You're right Fincuan
:o Eeeh uh:o :oops: :oops: :oops:
:p http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/7...iq3playjd6.jpg :sunny: :rotfl: |
I know the feeling Starlion :rotfl:
|
Norway is not that far away from Denmark, so I enclose some of my own photos made in the end of June from about 7-10 in the evening. And I think that the current environmental mods for SH4 catches that view pretty well, given the circumstance that it's still just a game, and not total realistic. But still, I think it looks far more real than SH3 ever did.
Of course, pc hardware has something to do with the view as well. Having had a top notch high end pc for the last 2 years does the trick for me. http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y28...s/DSC00846.jpg http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y28...s/DSC00868.jpg http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y28...s/DSC00873.jpg http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y28...s/DSC00874.jpg http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y28...s/DSC00875.jpg http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y28...s/DSC00876.jpg http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y28...s/DSC00889.jpg http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y28...s/DSC00892.jpg http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y28...s/DSC00911.jpg http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y28...s/DSC00973.jpg http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y28...s/DSC00974.jpg However, it sometimes feels against all odds to discuss opinions with someone from the opposite view... http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y28...rsonGifted.jpg |
Some people you are just not going to reach. shrugs.
The water in SH4 is far superior than SH3 ever was. But, hey, that is just me. |
Quote:
|
this last one is mostly true, but there are occasions when SH3 water does it better. Sh4 rules for the calmer seas with rippling. Sometimes it's so good it's astonishing.
But the rougher seas are generally no better than SH3 and often not as good - and this is important for ATO, since rough north atlantic seas are what we think of first. still i think this problem is due to textures no longer fitting the wavetypes and could probably be fixed in a dedicated Atlantic Environments mod that requires this more often overall, i love SH4 too. The evasion routines of damaged ships is amazing - it can be so hard to kill a damaged merchant that is really trying to get away from you. You can spend hours trying to finish one off, especially with RFB with the seriously nerfed deck gun |
Quote:
Hehe...true:D |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.