![]() |
Is it contageous?:huh:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
RETRY! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's a pretty disingenuous post-hoc justification. It was claimed that Iraq possessed proper stockpiles of illegal munitions and had hidden development programmes, not that there were old gas shells buried where they fell 10-20 years ago, much like you can still find on any WW1 battlefield. |
Quote:
I think it's pretty disingenuous of you to imply otherwise.... |
Who would you put in Bush's place? John Kerry? He spent most of the 1990s criticizing Bill Clinton for NOT going after Saddam, because, as he (Kerry) put it, everybody KNOWS Saddam had WMDs. Kerry only changed his tune when he realized that being a pro-war Democrat candidate wasn't going to cut it.
Bush may have been wrong, but he didn't lie. Or else all the Dems lied, too, until it became cool to oppose the war. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
There is no evidence to suggest they were actually hidden stockpiles destined for later use, and not just lost relics haphazardly strewn around. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Obviously we've been finding them. THAT implys we have information as to their whereabouts. That had to come from somewhere... |
Quote:
|
who gives a **** what she said, if everyone thought the same way, none of our opinions would matter.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.