![]() |
Why are you trying to disagree with a perfectly legitimate poll? I have a feeling you will never like the results, unless they display what you want them to display...
In that case, it's not even worth it to start a discussion with you. I've already said too much... |
Re: SH4 before DC2?
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Im happy with either DC2 or SHIV, but I really just want SH3 finnished. If they wont do it then at least release the source code so we can! :damn:
|
Quote:
You are mistaken, SH III was relative success mostly because of casual gamers buying the game. Die hard fans are not enough to justify the total sales of SH III. The sim as it came out wasn't a die hard naval simulation, of course the mods released afterwards increased the realism etc... but how many of the gaming populace actually used the mods ? Only naval-die hard fans thats it. In this day and age, if military simulations (of any kind) are to succeed in the marketplace then they have to cater to casual gamers, its like this and nothing you say is going to change the situation. So some people are correct in assessing that multiplayer goes a long way to increase the visibility and long term success of a franchise. You can rest assured that in 1 years time SH III will be forgotten within the casual gamers. There just isn't enough to keep one interested so long, and dynamic campaign as good as it is can only take the confrontation so far. For instance Falcon 4 success is not onyl due to its impressive dynamic campaign (much more impressive than SH III by the way) but because of its online capabilities. Do you honestly think people would still be playing Falcon 4 after 7 years if there wasn't an online component ? |
In essence you're asking how popular a Destroyer sim would be in a sub forumn. What kind of answer can you possibly expect?
As far as multiplayer, how can you look for multiplay fans in what has evolved into a single player game? The same problem. You're "marketing" to the small niche of players who hang around in these forums, who are only a fraction of the total folks out there. If DC had been done well it would have been a winner. It wasn't, and very early it got a reputation as a "problem child". Plus it wasn't released simultaneously with SH2, which pretty well sank it. That whole release was problematic. There are tons of ship fans out there, but no game has recently catered to what surface combatants like--much less a multiplayer campaign combining both... Don't get into the attitude of thinking you sub folks are the whole world... It's simply not true. It is just that until Dangerous Waters, nobody has made a product including a worthy ASW effort. |
Quote:
|
Thats why I would prefer a true NAVAL SIM/GAME, where its all under 1 roof, no addon no patch, just all the fruit from day 1. You can take a sub to sea, skipper a DD/DE, Command a BB or carrier, launch planes, lay mines, do recon-intel/specop/resupply missions. Play as Allied or Axis with any country that was in the war. On the Multiplayer side ALL unit types would be PCO ( Player Controled Objects) enabled - think a Naval only version of BF BUT with the benfits of the SHIII/IV engine with the campain as is and the globe as your play pen, now you would have to admit, it be damn FUN !
You guys are thinking to small - Sub sim v's DC sim. I'm after the LOT - WWII at Sea, nothing less, with all that entales that I can play in single mode or multi mode (online or lan) with both decent AI and the advantage of PCO's to engage. This is nothing new that hasn't been done to other type's of games before so its not like its impossible. UBI wants a winner, well the above would be a bloody good start !!! |
Well definitely this sim needs a humman manned DD or escort.
I do not think this is so difficult to implement since it was done before already and this will give the whole sim a total new scope of possibilities. SHIII have been a really good and inmersive Sim but the lack of real Multiplayer possibilities makes it limp. Of course a full Naval Sim with Carriers, Planes, Battlecruisers and so would be good although I am afraid we will need a new generation of computers to have this. However at this stage a Sub vs Escort the way SHII was done but with the SHIII concepts would surely makr a milestone for thsi sim. My two cents |
Quote:
http://forums.ubi.com/groupee/forums...wpollresults/Y 3 times more players wish to have DC2 than SH4. 77% out of more than 200 users. Is that clear enough ? |
Quote:
I forgot about this poll. Look's like it's been eating at you, though. Hope you feel vindicated. |
Whats so wrong with a DC/SH combo?
Pilot a DD on convoy duty from the states to England while fighting off the wolfpack sounds just as much fun as slipping a eel into a convoy. Just my 2¢ |
While i am curious about SH4 (as opposed to Excited, I guess. I want to know how various things will be handled in it before i go to defcon 5,) a decent WW2 DD sim would have me ready to help play the development costs right now....
Quote:
Actually, if you will excuse me I'm going to go look for my DC disk....I might be a while. :) |
Quote:
|
Maybe it is not needed that they build DC2
Quote:
Beta preview http://www.subclub.info/phpBB_subclu...asc&highlight= Thanks. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.