Nice link,a snail :D

Platapus.....Why you gotta be a buzzkill? :O:

Just kidding. :har: This thread is the next Rick Roll. :cool:

She has boobs?

Can barely tell.:O:

Anyways I actually found this interesting. They found a scumbag paparazzi to expose how this stalking sack of offal got this photo, I hate Matt Lauer, but at least tolerate the video, it was somewhat interesting.

When the guy stated the camera setup cost about 20k$, just shows how sad people are.



http://video.today.msnbc.msn.com/tod...70527#49070527

My apologies for exposing you to Matt Lauer.

On a side note, where is the line to be drawn legally, between journalism and invasion of privacy?

I am one to usually mock so called royalty, but value privacy even more.

Actually, it is a Blue Tit. :yep:

And Dowly is the resident expert. :03:

I'm disappointed with the photo of Kate Middleton.:down: I was expecting to see some royal nakedness.

After all, what is the internet good for but:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNARJPNz2CA

And I do think Dowly is right. The avian bird in the picture looks like a blue tit to me.

I knew this would be a pic of a bird - well a royal bird with a bird. :woot:

Only 70-odd away from that magic 1000 views.

Let's add some more royalty. :D

http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/210/harrycloser.jpg

Hit the road Harry, :O:

^The family on the way to Vegas to attend Harry's overtures, :D

1071 views in something like 28 hours :yeah:

Pervs.

Hey, leave Steed outta this. He had his own scandal.

@ Herr-Ber.
Just to help your thread post/view count:D, could you imagine if Kate teamed up with Brittney Spears or Paris Hilton? That would be a paprazzi feeding frenzy!:haha: