It's not bad, really.

In its current state, it's just awful.

Now it all depends on developers and their will to fix the game. The modders alone will not be able to fix numerous bugs, glitches and design mistakes in SH5.

I guess everyone missed the sarcasm. A poll with 100 participants means nothing.

Just like the thread a few weeks back where we were urged to boycott SH5 because that is what 61% of "the community" wanted, again based on another meaningless poll.

Ultimately, the only opinion that counts is what each player thinks about the game:

-If you like it, great, play it.

-If you don't like it, great, don't play it.

all the rest is just meaningless background static..

I vote good, it aint perfect right now but its a much better base to build on than either sh3 or 4 was at launch.

Very little time for such a large project
 

I think the guys at Ubisoft are quite good and much better working all that.
In effect, we have an effective working of the present ca.3 months Remaining time was done with planning and preparation.
Very little time for such a large project:-?

---------------------------
Ich denke die Jungs von UBISOFT haben ganz gut und viel arbeit das alles zu verbessern.
In grunde genommen haben wir eine effektive Arbeit von ca.3 Monaten vorliegen die Restliche zeit wurde mit Planung und vorbereitung gemacht.
Sehr wenig zeit für so ein Großes Projekt.

It is currently unplayable for me, I can't enter the submarine. If I leave shadows on and enter the sub, the framerate drops to about 1 every 3 seconds. If I turn shadows off then the screen fades black every 3 - 5 seconds and stays that way for 3 - 20 seconds before fading back in until the game eventually locks up. At the moment I'd rate it as very bad.