mookiemookie |
08-26-09 07:25 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteamWake
(Post 1159479)
Can anyone state some good things about poor ole Teddy, no really a positive piece of legislation or something... anything?
|
I thought I did?
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by August
(Post 1159379)
I don't see Ted Kennedy being remembered for much of anything.
Once his usefulness as a martyr dies along with nationalized health care his faults, manslaughter, alcoholism, etc, will make him politically toxic.
|
As I said before, I wasn't much of a fan because he did bring a lot of baggage to the table, but I found this list interesting:
Quote:
Do you like your state and not the federal government controlling the curriculum of your kids' schools? Thank Ted Kennedy.
Do you like being able to vote starting at age 18? Thank Ted Kennedy.
Do you think low-income people should get help with heating their homes in the winter? Thank the man.
Do you think the federal government should fund cancer research? Yep.
Do you believe that Meals on Wheels is a good thing? Ditto.
Does your daughter (or you, if you're female) like playing soccer or basketball or softball at school? That'd be because of Ted Kennedy.
Do you think that disabled people should be able to go to school? Have access to buildings? Not be discriminated against for housing and loads of other things? Kennedy, big time.
You like your cheap airfares? You know the answer.
You think people on welfare oughta get jobs? So did Kennedy.
You think mental institutions should treat people humanely? Yeah, so did your new friend, Ted Kennedy.
You believe that the Defense Department should provide child care for the kids of soldiers? Kennedy did.
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aramike
(Post 1159477)
[
Mookie, I doubt you're one of them, but I have to ask ... would YOU have voted for Kennedy?
|
That's really a good question. I have no idea who ran against him in all of his years, and that (given our "lesser of the two evils" system) would be a major factor in who I would have voted for.
Kennedy lived on his name. That's a powerful force in politics where the American public votes on emotion, rather than facts and analysis.
I would have had qualms voting for someone who let someone else die through their own stupid actions, of course. But (and NOT to excuse it, please don't take it that way) Thomas Jefferson was banging his slaves, Ulysses S Grant was involved in the Whiskey Ring, Harding had his Teapot Dome scandal....it seems to be a thread of commonality with those in power.
I guess the ultimate decision came down to the people of Massachusetts who elected him and reelected him...as I said, I would have had serious qualms voting for the guy, but if you look at his legislative record (at least from the list I posted here), it's hard to fault the guy's positions. They're pretty bipartisan and common sense across the board.
Good question though.
|