![]() |
Quote:
And F-35 is NOT the answer. It can carry all of what, four AIM-120Cs when configured for pure A2A? Will big motor AAMs even fit in its weapons bay? But if they don't, we'll just carry them on the external pylons, right? Well no. Because the F-35 NEEDS its stealth. It cannot survive without it any better than a late model F-16 can. It can't simply decline the engagement like the Raptor can if the odds don't look good. PD |
Quote:
Anyway, when fighting against these SU, stay in AB constant. With Mach 1.2 to 1.4 in your belt, you have the airspeed you need to deal with the AMRAAMSKI by flying perpendicular to it. Problem is, about the time the 120 D's come online, the Russian counterpart is also not far behind. They have an Improved AMRAAMSKI on the board too. -S |
Quote:
-S PS. Your analogy of the F-15 is like a MiG-21 equipped with an AESA radar going up against a F-15. Yes, has some potential, but not much. |
Quote:
Quote:
VLO F-16 with four AMRAAMs tops had BETTER be able to kill the threat with its limited number of limited AAMs. Because after those are gone it won't be able to decline the egagement. And the engagement will be starting closer than any legacy F-teen fighter equipped with a big motor AAM. PD |
Quote:
HHHMM MiG-21:hmm: Now I'm feeling nostagic. I really need to get up to speed on modern fighters. I'm still stuck in the 80's:dead: cross-post okay, I need to get up to par on all these new jets::dead: Su-30 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORXhn...eature=related F-35: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpClG...eature=related F-22 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_Q6Vb9xJM0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teb4N...eature=related Su-47 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyjxq...eature=related |
Well, lets put it more clearly - An F-15C /w AESA against an AESA equipped foe is going to have big problems since guess what? An AESA equipped foe will negate any advatage of an AIM-120D with simple jamming using the AESA radar. You probably could fry an AIM-120D's electronics with AESA. So the F-15 has to get in close since it would be a wash from range.
What exactly is it going to do at this point when all 2nd teir countries and many 3rd world countries are sporting better aircraft? Get the point yet? The F-15 is fine for about another 2 years if you like high loss rates. Go into any country equipped with decent Russian equipment with it come 2010, or even today, and you are going to have a 50% loss rate. It would be worse, but they probably don't have enough missiles left to finish the rest off. In an Air to air engagement against any of the aircraft I list above and I bet you it is dead meat. What I find funny is the number of times they have said the dogfight is dead. AESA radars just made dogfights the likely scenario of the future to make a kill against non stealth aircraft. Medium or long range fights are becoming obsolete once again. -S |
All of this stuff seems expensive. How many F-22's do we have in our arsenal?
|
Quote:
-S |
Quote:
HunterICX |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
AESA articles: http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...as-jammer.html http://www.reprintbuyer.com/mags/avi...1-11920469.pdf And BTW Subman, I'm glad I have nothing to do at work today. I enjoy arguing this type of stuff. As I can see you do as well. :) PD |
Well now that we are talking close in dogfights with "bad guys" that can fry long range shots...
So no B-1R... Carry on! |
Quote:
PD |
A little off topic but is anyone else wondering about these weird proposals from Boeing lately?
First they lose to the F-35 Then they start getting massive delays on the 787 Then the A380 gets shipped and is working well Then they lose to the KC-45 So they are going to have to do better than Mach 2 Missile trucks they need somthing that is going to actually work for 20-30 years. If I were them Id start some stealth drone program. |
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-45 PD |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.