Quote:
Originally Posted by Letum
I thought communication gear is only harmful if there is enough short frequency EM waves to cause heating of brain tissue (or DNA damage with very, very short wavelengths) ?
Are there other effects from low level, long wave exposure?
|
There have been a few studies done on their long term effect, everthing from brain lesions to effects on the brains neural pathways, but nothing conclusive. But then again we didn't know about the stuff you mention for a long time after we started using the technology either, and that's just our species. We don't rely on magnetic fields to get around anymore. However we understand even less about it's effect on other animals, especially insects.
Quote:
I wouldn't worry about the earths magnetic field. The geological records show that the current weakening is nothing too special compared to other waxes and wanes. It's interesting, however to not that the earth's poles are a little over due for their periodical flip, which would cause total chaps!
I very much doubt bees travel far enough to find the poles helpful for navigation. It's far from a uniform magnetic field.
|
What I was thinking is that if bees do indeed rely on magentic fields for navigation then even stationary EM fields like say nearby radio and TV station beacons become potentially useable fixed points of reference to back up and perhaps even substituting for the earths magnetic field to show them the way back to the hive.
It's not the pole reversal thats important. That'll no doubt have some negative effect but it would probably be slow enough for most creatures to adapt with little disruption. The fastest field change they've found by studying magma from the last pole switch according to a documentary I watched awhile back was 90 degrees over a weeks time. That would I'd think still be good enough for the short trips that bees make to and from their himes.
Rather its the increased magnetic pole wane we've been experiencing when coupled with the massive increase in
mobile technology (and i'm not talking just cellphones either) what concerns me.
Just imagine if the scenery around you constantly changed, You see roads and buildings and mountains (magnetic fields to a bee in this analogy) constantly changing shape and dissapearing and appearing in different places. Could you find your way back home from work every day?
Well maybe you could if you had at least had one fixed point of reference to go by but what if eventually you couldn't pick it out from the static even some of the time? There ain't no holiday inns in bee land. They either make it back to the hive while the image they have of the magnetic fields around them is valid or they are dead by morning from exhaustion and exposure.
I'd be really interested in seeing a study on what the cellphone and other mobile electronic usage, including both the stuff we carry on our person and in our vehicles, is in the areas where bee hives suffer this syndrome as compared to the ones that don't. I'll bet we might find a correlation with increased incidents and their proximity to populated or well travelled areas like cities, roads and highways.
After all everyone carries cell phones these days and if my students are any indication they use them incessantly when they're not using their ipod, of blasting their car stereos and sometimes even when they are. I would think that also applies to bee keepers assistants, farm workers and anyone else who get near the hives as well.