Okay, now I have got to go out with friends. I will prepare it tomorrow or later tonight :up:

what do you mean by "changes at the margin of error"? :hmmm:
have you tried setting wind speed as high as possible?

:yep:

I don't know how to say.. insignificant.. within the limits of permissible variation..

Yes.. just set tolerance to 100 and wind speed to 10.. nothing..

Forgot to say, this 'cheat', when you ordered 'battle stations' using order's bar and your gunners don't leave the guns even when wind speed is 10-12m, is not working for deckgun gunners.. :)

I could not help to notice, that the Soldati class destroyer has two KGun Mk 9's, and no depth charge racks, I decided to test how the ship would hunt submarines with this unusual loadout, the tests yielded poor results, the Soldati was unable to land even a single hit on the British submarine, because the Kgun has a fifteen second reload time, meaning that it hold has one chance per-pass to get a hit.
But the ship doesn't compensate for not have any depth charge racks, to it steams over the sub throwing depth charges off to the side but with no hits.
So I used TDW's GR2 editor to reverse the Node's for the depth charge throwers, and I put depth charge racks on instead, and now it is perfectly capable of sinking enemy submarines.

From what I could find on the web, the Soldati was not an anti submarine vessel at all, and it did not have a sonar/hydrophone let alone depth charges.

Okay.. I need one fast target, 15-20 knots, bearing 0 deg, course 90 deg, range 1 km..

When target's speed is 0 hard to figure something.. :hmmm:

http://www.mediafire.com/?2nxkczuy0qi6mna :up:

OK, I got it.. :up:

I thought for a little yesterday :O:
We have played with the tolerance angles.. what for? in any case, changes don't affect the accuracy regarding of weather or sea conditions..
Nevertheless, I was finally convinced yesterday that the changes in the tolerance angles not lead to any changes in accuracy.. :yep:

EDIT: Ooops.. again new face.. :D

yes, standing at the poor results we have achieved so far, investigating about those factors was only a waste of time. I wonder if they are of any use at all as far as SH5 is concerned :hmmm:

Volodya's Air Attack Folly

Run it at your own risk :03: :D

and we demand a video!!!!! :haha:

Folly?.. maybe.. maybe not :hmm2:
I'll say it a little later :haha:

but.. if we set angle=0 then nothing.. no shoot, no move, no animation.. :hmmm:

:agree:

That's also true. The setting is applied, but how? :06:

Probably you want to ask me - Who won? :03:
We are!
Even with VIIC, even with only one single C30 :D
I'm afraid Trevally will need to place a lot more air in the campaign :rotfl2:

Try it and I'm sure you'll like and enjoy it, it's real fun - http://rghost.ru/44089413

But now become a must the question - how to make them worse? :hmmm:

Now I will try it with another IRAI, maybe with IRAI 0.37 it could not be so easy and simply.. :)

:o

Have you tried lowering crew veterancy level?

for sure by adjusting elevation/train speed, maybe by tuning down a bit your super accurate index settings, but...

...before anything else, switch IRAI version. I gave those planes plenty of torpedoes, bombs and depth charges, which they won't use with the latest IRAI "cheat" :03:

Not yet.. will try it..

Yes, with IRAI 0.37 it was much harder.. and, in my opinion, plane's behavior was more realistic than with the v0.39.. but.. after two-three approaches they also don't shoot and drop bombs..
I think we are not able to do something with it.. maybe TDW.. someday..

PS: I have deleted the file, did you get it?

Keep in mind that airplanes have limited bomb loadouts. But imo just one bomb hit should be devastating.

yes :up: