If that was because of this:

There were actually two posts before that, and one was just Hottentot expressing his annoyance with his typical humour.

I love that guy.

No, it was because of the one two posts above yours.

GROUP HUG!!!!!!!! :sunny:

In the beginning there was the word and the word was Creationist Explains How Humans Could Have Hunted The Tyrannosaurus Rex and lo the sky filled with the roar of laughter as the outcome of the topic was well known as it is fortold.

^^^^

:har:

I can't believe this thread is still going..

Someone else mentioned this stuff about getting the last word in.
I wonder where that idea came from?
Getting the last word no way means your right, no way means you win. It sounds to me to just be a reply to get the last word in.
I declared this thing dead, but I guess others had different thoughts.

My last reply:
Was to show that both sides had problems with this subject. No one noticed anything I posted, only that it was two weeks later and I was just trying to get the last word in, and I wasn't making an argument.

Heres what cracks me up:
Condell is an atheist. So to quote him as having any kind of meaning to the discussion makes him and the poster correct?
This goes on without question while I get railed on for posting after two weeks.:nope: Is there a rule about two weeks? Maybe there should be.
Now wait for at least one more post, I don't want to be the last. That might mean I win or something, and then lock this damn thing up.:yep:

Tell that to my wife....:O: She has no problem getting the last word in and claiming victory.

"Declaring things dead" is doing exactly that. Not to mention doing it twice and still going on two pages later. You don't declare things dead. You simply stop posting in topic and move on. Eventually everyone else will do the same.

Try it with this post.

You're welcome to think what you want.

Twice. Like you have the power to declare anything at all.

You might want to go back and check what you said at that time. The thread was just lying there for two weeks. Somebody else brought it back just to say it was still going. We gave him grief. Then it lay there for two more weeks. You posted, but made no argument at all.

Were you infracted for violating a rule? No, you were criticized for resurrecting a thread for no good reason.

Still giving orders?

Belief is not required, evidence you supplied yourself proves that the continuing existance of this creation was ongoing at the time of your post.
Demonstrable facts beat belief any day, apart from holidays:03:

Just because you say it, doesn't make it so. I don't have to supply evidence to myself and no one can make me.

I declare this thread dead......

Further proof that it is still going.

You only keep posting after me to insure I don't pass you in post count.

Are we all done now?