SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   US Politics Thread 2021-24 (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=248184)

Buddahaid 02-12-23 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u crank (Post 2852697)
Of course it was his own opinion. Whose else's would it be? I'm pretty sure that is why he was there, to give his opinion.

He was there as an expert witness and shown to not have any more basis for the claim than you or me.

u crank 02-12-23 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buddahaid (Post 2852713)
He was there as an expert witness and shown to not have any more basis for the claim than you or me.

It would appear that Mr. Turley has researched the matter at hand and is well able to expound on it.

https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/ev...ponization.pdf

Buddahaid 02-12-23 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u crank (Post 2852724)
It would appear that Mr. Turley has researched the matter at hand and is well able to expound on it.

https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/ev...ponization.pdf

Good for him. Useless as testimony.

u crank 02-12-23 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buddahaid (Post 2852725)
Good for him. Useless as testimony.

Good for him? Wow, how mature.

You realize that the 'good for him' will be entered into the record. And that is all that matters.

Buddahaid 02-12-23 08:01 PM

In the end it's still an opinion and will remain opinion no matter how many titles or degrees he accumulates. Are you suggesting it isn't when even he said it is opinion?

u crank 02-12-23 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buddahaid (Post 2852729)
In the end it's still an opinion and will remain opinion no matter how many titles or degrees he accumulates. Are you suggesting it isn't when even he said it is opinion?

:hmmm:

Quote:

Originally Posted by u crank (Post 2852697)
Of course it was his own opinion. Whose else's would it be? I'm pretty sure that is why he was there, to give his opinion.


Buddahaid 02-12-23 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u crank (Post 2852730)
:hmmm:

So what is your point then? His opinion should be treated as factual evidence?

u crank 02-12-23 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buddahaid (Post 2852731)
So what is your point then? His opinion should be treated as factual evidence?

I never said his opinion was factual evidence. I said it was opinion. Twice. He never said it was factual evidence. He has pointed out what was already known about the Twitter files and has given his legal and constitutional opinion about those known facts. I don't know how else to explain it.

I'm done.

Buddahaid 02-12-23 09:27 PM

We just keep repeating ourselves anyway.

les green01 02-12-23 11:09 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjx_ma5aZNo

Rockstar 02-13-23 02:04 PM

This is what happens when you don’t step back and ask questions and instead just become a member of largest most gullible Blue Anon conspiracy theorist group ever known to mankind a.k.a. The Democrat party fanboi.

I get a kick out of it when I think how people’s continued obsession with Trump is based on orchestrated lies and illusion.

https://youtu.be/eWQGYpSoiYU

Buddahaid 02-13-23 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rockstar (Post 2852820)
This is what happens when you don’t step back and ask questions and instead just become a member of largest most gullible Blue Anon conspiracy theorist group ever known to mankind a.k.a. The Democrat party fanboi.

I get a kick out of it when I think how people’s continued obsession with Trump is based on orchestrated lies and illusion.

Wow, you're right! Only people who step back and ask questions belief crap like this from the chief Maghat.
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/6352/ooMG53.png

Rockstar 02-13-23 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buddahaid (Post 2852878)
Wow, you're right! Only people who step back and ask questions belief crap like this from the chief Maghat.
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/6352/ooMG53.png

You’re barking up the wrong tree dude. I don’t think for a minute anyone here pays any attention to that crap either and sees it for what it is, crap and most certainly no reason pay attention to him or vote for the guy. However I do think there are gullible koolaid drinking party fanbois on both sides of the spectrum. I just find that Blue Anon a.k.a. the Democrat party is the largest and most vocal group of the two.

The only time I see the above crap is when you post it.

Buddahaid 02-13-23 08:08 PM

The funny part is some of that crap and the Q-anon stuff that goes with it will end up as evidence against him in the legal proceedings.

Rockstar 02-13-23 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buddahaid (Post 2852884)
The funny part is some of that crap and the Q-anon stuff that goes with it will end up as evidence against him in the legal proceedings.

That’s nice but I don’t care, and so the battle between Blue anon and Qanon continues.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.