SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - US Politics Thread 2021-24

JONATHAN TURLEY: The congresswoman was asking if I've ever worked at Twitter as a condition for my talking about what the Twitter Files say. It's like saying you have to work at the Pentagon if you want to testify about the implications of the Pentagon Papers. The point of witnesses before committees is often to give legal analysis based on what is known and what could be found in this investigation. The exchange she was referring to was a member who expressly asked me about the Twitter Files and what this suggests about what I've called censorship by surrogate. And then she went into this issue of, 'Well, you've never worked at Twitter. How do you know what goes on at Twitter?,' which is completely absurd. The whole premise of my testimony was that Twitter has now authenticated and confirmed these facts. These facts are coming from Twitter. These are Twitter files. And the facts indicate that they had weekly meetings with the government. They indicate that the government would send long lists of citizens and others to be targeted, censored, to be in some cases, banned. Those are very serious allegations that raise constitutional questions, which is why I was there to discuss it.

I for one would be interested in hearing Buddas opinion on the above rather than his commentary on network bias.

les green01

02-12-23 02:44 AM

news you want the best news open your door and look out news networks just going tell you what they want to tell you or what they want you to believe.

Skybird

02-12-23 08:22 AM

Not as wanted and thus kept secret.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ectoral-fraud/

Rockstar

02-12-23 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skybird (Post 2852607)

Not as wanted and thus kept secret.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ectoral-fraud/

Oh christ here we go again :roll:. “according to four people familiar with the matter.” “dozens of people said” which means what? Furthermore it’s no secret but just in case you missed it the official results were in December 12th 2020 and he lost the election. That was over two years ago, do try to keep up.

Skybird

02-12-23 08:37 AM

He is still in denial.
Many still beleive him.
He will be candidating again.
Russia predominantly would vote for him. :O:

After the attempted coup is before the next attempted coup.

Rockstar

02-12-23 08:41 AM

Trump is in denial. Tell me something I don’t know, everyone of them piss and moan when they lose elections, everything from hanging chads, to getting rid of the electoral college when they don’t get their way. And papers more than ever seem to rely on their readers believing faceless, nameless, anonymous sources for their stories and on top of that don’t really tell us anything new.

mapuc

02-12-23 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rockstar (Post 2852612)

One thing I very, very convinced of is that Mr. Trump will, if not destroy the Republican party, then divide it.

How many percentage of the Rep voters who will put their vote on Trump I can't say. I would say more than 20 %.

Which mean the Dem-are going to win Next election-No matter who they put forward as candidate(in this case Biden)

Markus

Buddahaid

02-12-23 11:41 AM

Sure FOX. They go to trial in two months over the 1.6 billion Dominion lawsuit and they are being called out for hiding evidence.

But let's talk about Trump's troubles.

Special Council Jack Smith:
Investigating the NARA records - obstruction of justice indictment looming
and possible espionage act complications.

Investigating 2020 election interference and Jan 6th insurrection.

Fani Willis:
Fulton County election interference.

Manhattan DA:
Stormy Daniel's hush money - new special grand jury empaneled on an
illegal campaign contribution in 2016 paid by Trump through Coen.

NY AG Letitia James:
Tax fraud by the trump organization's cooking the books.

And there is also now evidence of campaign violation through money laundering of one million dollars paid by the Save America Pact to the Cyber Ninja recount of the Mariposa County, AZ election results.

u crank

02-12-23 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u crank (Post 2852446)

What’s FOX got to do with what he is saying?

How about answering my question?

Buddahaid

02-12-23 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u crank (Post 2852648)

How about answering my question?

By giving him a platform to try and discredit how he was expertly maneuvered into admitting all he had to offer was personal opinion during his testimony. By his own words he admitted it was his opinion.

u crank

02-12-23 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buddahaid (Post 2852652)

Of course it was his own opinion. Whose else's would it be? I'm pretty sure that is why he was there, to give his opinion.

Quote:

The whole premise of my testimony was that Twitter has now authenticated and confirmed these facts. These facts are coming from Twitter. These are Twitter files. And the facts indicate that they had weekly meetings with the government. They indicate that the government would send long lists of citizens and others to be targeted, censored, to be in some cases, banned. Those are very serious allegations that raise constitutional questions, which is why I was there to discuss it.

Skybird

02-12-23 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rockstar (Post 2852612)

Hes tood apart. And at congress elecitons, a small handfull of his party comrade tried the same stunt like him again.

No, the example he gave cannot be compared with any other. It stands for itself. That's why no one in his right mind will ever let it out of his sight again. "Fool me once - shame on you. Fool me twice - shame on me."

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 AM.

Page 345 of 882

345

Show 20 post(s) from this thread on one page