![]() |
|
Just give him high doses of decadron for few days or weeks.
He's gonna be on his knees and will do anything for this to stop. |
Here is another drawing
http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/image...cell_2_464.gif 1. Window - partially blocked to leave only a view of the sky 2. Shower - water on a timer switch to prevent flooding 3. Fixed concrete stool and writing desk 4. Combined toilet, sink and water fountain unit 5. Polished steel mirror But it should be noted that there are several different types of cells and different levels of confinement largely dependent on the inmate's conduct. While there are some lifers who will never see the light of day, the average stay at ADX is 3.18 years before being transferred back to "normal" maximum security prisons. This number is disputed and other studies have indicated that the average stay at ADX is 8.2 years. http://solitarywatch.com/2012/10/06/...permax-prison/ The difference is because ADX has what is called a "three year program" where well behaved inmates (with few exceptions) are allowed, after 3 years to transfer to other programs/levels of confinement at the same facility with the goal of eventually to transfer to other facilities. So it may take an inmate 3.18 years to get out of Z-block and another 5 years to get transferred to an other facility. |
Quote:
Why do you think that? Unless the media taints the jury pool that is. |
Quote:
|
According to the Swedish newspaper, aftonbladet.se
He wasn't given the Miranda warnings(they did not read his rights) under his arrest and because of this it is not given if he will get the penalties I have been trying to use google translate, but that translate doens't work at all. (maybe one day in the near future it will work, the translate) Markus |
|
Quote:
So why do you hate America and why are you so desperate to help the terrorists? |
Quote:
It is not about finding a jury who is impartial about the crime. It is about finding a jury who is impartial about the defendant. It is about not having preconceptions or biases about the innocence or guilt of the defendant; not how the jury feels about the crime itself. You can be extremely emotional and biased about the crime itself and still be impartial about the defendant. It happens all the time. There is a difference between the crime and the person accused of the crime.... at least there should be. What we want to avoid is the media "convicting" the defendant before the trial or getting a jury who thinks that "well since he is accused of the crime, he must be guilty". (Edwin Meese likes that) Hence my comment about conflicting constitutional rights. Take yourself. Do you think you would be unable to be impartial about the defendant based on your feelings of the crime he will be accused of? |
Quote:
"U.S. officials said a special interrogation team for high-value suspects would question him without reading him his Miranda rights, under a public safety exception that exists to protect police and the public from immediate danger. Miranda rights include the right to remain silent and the right to have a lawyer." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
*I* care that he gets a fair trial. While we have strayed in the past decade, I still feel that we are a nation of laws. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.