![]() |
Quote:
I think your fun with numbers comment was spot on. "And so, while the gender and the age of the deceased were recorded in the 2006 Johns Hopkins study, nobody, according to Dr. Roberts, recorded demographic information for the living survey respondents. This would be the first survey I have looked at in my 15 years of looking that did not ask demographic questions of its respondents. But don't take my word for it--try using Google to find a survey that does not ask demographic questions. Without demographic information to assure a representative sample, there is no way anyone can prove--or disprove--that the Johns Hopkins estimate of Iraqi civilian deaths is accurate" You don't have to verify the data. Trust us;) |
Iraq Body Count: whos telling the truth ?
The number of civilians reported to have been killed during the Iraq war and subsequent military presence is being recorded by the campaign group Iraq Body Count.
On 15 September 2006 it put the total number of reported civilian dead at 40,775 to 45,559 and the number of police dead at 2,437. The issue of counting the number of Iraqis killed since the US-led invasion is highly controversial and the figure is disputed. The US and UK military authorities do not record the number of civilians killed by their forces. The security situation and administrative chaos also make counting extremely difficult. So where does 600,000 come from? If No one else but this group are actually counting? Sounds to me the 600,000 figure, is some what like the Threat of "WMDs". Just waffle with no substance of proof. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4525412.stm |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Well if they could put the legs, arms and head back on the body, I think the count would be more accurate. :know:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.