35 minutes, 45 minutes - who cares. It was complete nonsens, written off from a student'S 10 years-old work, I vaguely remember. It surely was one of the biggest laughs in the attempts to justify the war.

BTW, the enrichment level they are said in the medias to have accieved is 3%. this is enough to fuel a nuclear popwer plant with it (if it is efficient operation is something different). But you need material with an enrichement level of almost 90% to build an uranium (not plutonium) bomb. For plutonium, the material needs to be additionally reprocessed - a step they have not conducted so far.

The UN starts to apply agressive diplomatic pressure to turn the thumbscrews on Iran:
That'll teach 'em!

As expected, Hense. :roll: :zzz:

Reactor grade plutonium can be used in weapons, as verified in a 1960's U.S. nuclear test.

Uranium enriched above 20 percent is used in nuclear weapons.

Yours, Mike

what are you babbling about now mad... first of all, i didn't say anything at all about plutonium, why are you directing your post at me... you're so anxious to say something... anything... that you don't even know who you should be directing your comments to... go back and read the posts again s... l... o... w... l... y..... this time...

second... all plutonium is made in a reactor... a uranium reactor... wouldn't it seem sort of ass backwards to try and make a plutonium device that would be of significantly lower yield, and would reqire more expertise as far as handling, than to enrich uranium in facilities that they already have...

third... why go through all the trouble of producing and handling plutonium... why not just make a non nuclear 'dirty' explosive device from the spent uranium... or for that matter, from any of the radioative materials at various labs and hospitals all over the world could be used...

avon says...
teach em what!!! they ignore the UN imperitives at will... what's it gonna teach em :doh:

ya know... with every post you make, it becomes more clear that you know very little about what you assert to be your field of expertise... or maybe it's some irrational fear that's making you post such obvious drivel... or maybe it's something else... maybe like avon, you too are on some sort of religiously motivated crusade...

either way... the snooze alert is on... both of you are really starting get quite boring as far as this topic is concerned...

--Mike

Mike lied. People died. :zzz:
I was mocking the UN. Did you bother reading the 4 paragragh article I posted?

In any event, now that you say that UN "imperitives" won't teach Iran anything, what other suggestions, if any, do you have to deal with this situation? Or are you saying that the US should simply do nothing, other than perhaps aim a vast amount of their underground and sub-based nuclear tipped missiles at Iran and wait for the Iranians to shoot first? That's a possibile strategy, BTW, that no one's suggested here, if I haven't missed a post.
I never knew that trying to save one's life qualifies as a "religious crusade". Keep it up, Mike.
But you've said that already.

You just can't stay away, can you! :damn:

you aint tryin' to save anyone... you're incapable of even saving yourself from your own delusions, as evidenced by you viewing your position as an attempt to save anything... if anything, maybe you're trying to save own embarrassment...

you'd like me to stay away, wouldn't you... that's the typical method of people like you... you say things that have no basis in fact over and over again, and it begins to be accepted as truth by the unsuspecting out there... naaahhhhhh, sorry... i'm here avon... if only to make sure that a bit or reality and factual reference is presented... the truth is here... facts are gonna show you up for the lil hateful thing that you are... deal with it...

--Mike

On the contrary. Keep on posting here.

Go on. You know you want to.

Tell me more about my eyes. :roll:
So Iran isn't a dnager to anyone Mike? No humans will be harmed in giving Iran the nukes they're well on their way to developing?

You see, Mike? I want more replies from you.

Go on. You know you want to.

now where did i say that...

go ahead... quote me... show me where i said that... anywhere, on any post in any thread...

fact... i never said that... but like i did say before, facts have no place in your dimension...

this is a perfect example of the tactics people like you use to twist the facts of a situation...
no where... no how... no way.... did i say or even imply anything remotely similar to what you just said...

it's your eyes again... :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

or maybe it's your mind...

for some reason it seems that between the time that something you see enters your eyes, to the time it arrives at your 'brain'... it gets twisted around a lil... changed... morphed...

you surely are a shining result of a most effective brainwashing machine...

--Mike

You're a crackpot, Mike.

And yes, take that as an insult.

You first accuse me of promoting some "religious crusade". Please, quote my text here where I indicate that this has anything to uniquely do with my religion.

Then I reply that I've never known that saving one's life deafults to being a "religious crusade."

Then you come and tell me that I "aint tryin' to save anyone", in your exact words. And when I just asked you if that means you think no one's life is in danger, you retort "now where did i say that"?

I didn't claim you said it. I asked if that was your opinion.

So now it seems that you do admit that lives are in danger. Have we got that right, Mike?

Tell me Mike, is Iran possibly endangering my life?

Is Iran possibly endangering Euorpean's lives?

Is Iran possibly endagering US and maybe Canadian's lives?

Again, engage brain before typing, Mike.

i take it as the ravings of a sick lil mind... considering the source, it's not even worth replying to or getting upset about...

but the mods might take it a lil differently though... you've been warned once already, regarding your rabid dog outburst...

yes... you've shown that you are certainly no lady avon...

and concerning the above outburst... like i said,
show me where i said or implied anything even remotely close to what you state

you still have't done that...
you still are operating out there in the delusion dimension...



--Mike

Once again, you don't read. I'll repeat:

I didn't claim you said it. I asked if that was your opinion.

Maybe you should stop popping those valiums, Mike.

you didn't ask anything of the sort... you claimed that i already was of the opinion that Iran wasn't a threat...

your own words verify this
and you asked me to argue that position... a position which i never claimed to take, or even imply...

like i said above, your plumbing is defective... you have trouble understanding what is right in front of your eyes... your own statements verify this...

--Mike

Notice the question mark. You do know what a question mark is, don't you? There's another one!

do you notice i said
the question mark has nothing to do with it... obviously it's a question... a question that is based on a totally false assertion by a person who cannot seem to comprehend what is right in front of them...

just like the wmds that you see in your mind... the assertion you also envision is totally without basis... another figment of your imagination...

show me where i said or implied this position before you ask me to defend it...

ahhhh, i'm wasting my time... i'm talking to a brick...
no, i'm wrong, even a brick would understand what i'm saying... obviouslyu, you can't...

--Mike

Reading comprehension is a good thing, Mike. Go for it! We're all routing for ya! :rock:

you should be rooting for yourself...

with this latest post, you even make it more obvious that you can't comprehend something even when it's plain and clearly laid out right before you...

i clearly explained to you, i took the time to quote and slowly explain to you, that your question was based on an incorrect assertion on your part... step by step... patiently... as one would with a child...
yet you still can't see it...

tsk... tsk... tsk... :zzz:

--Mike

Some day maybe you'll catch on. But not today.

Come fa l'onda là sovra Cariddi,
che si frange con quella in cui s'intoppa,
così convien che qui la gente riddi.

Qui vid'i' gente più ch'altrove troppa,
e d'una parte e d'altra, con grand'urli,
voltando pesi per forza di poppa.

Percoteansi 'ncontro; e poscia pur lì
si rivolgea ciascun, voltando a retro,
gridando: «Perché tieni?» e «Perché burli?».

Così tornavan per lo cerchio tetro
da ogne mano a l'opposito punto,
gridandosi anche loro ontoso metro;

poi si volgea ciascun, quand'era giunto,
per lo suo mezzo cerchio a l'altra giostra.
E io, ch'avea lo cor quasi compunto,

dissi: «Maestro mio, or mi dimostra
che gente è questa, e se tutti fuor cherci
questi chercuti a la sinistra nostra».

Ed elli a me: «Tutti quanti fuor guerci
sì de la mente in la vita primaia,
che con misura nullo spendio ferci.

~Inferno, VII v. 25-42

more mindless avon babbling... :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

i think this thread has degenerated past any semblence of usefulness or relevancy... a long time ago...

someone please lock it up.

--Mike

That has been your suggestion to 2 threads you have mucked up so far.

Very open minded strategy. You can't put up so you shut 'em up.