Maybe i should of said Muslim extremist. And maybe like i remeber the muslims in our country going on television to express there regrets at what happen in the 9/11 are geniune, but its hard to trust a people that do it in the name of God and seem to hate the Jews who are gods chosen?. So WTF are the muslims going on about. Hypocrites.

Dowly, how is it going in the military?

Not wanting to get involved, why was the LTTE (Tamil Tigers) mentioned?

http://www.subsim.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=47630

:nope:

No, it's definitely his religion.

Because this was said:

I mentioned the LTTE becase the LTTE were and still are exponents of suicide bombing and have been one of the most active and successful groups in using this terrorist strategy. In fact only a month ago today a Sri Lanken Navy ship was attacked by an LTTE suicide attack craft which killed 13 sailors. In fact this attack was not dissimalar from that of Al Qaeda operatives upon the USS Cole in Yemen years back. Hope this clarifies where I am coming from.

So....you're against Kiwis point or reinforcing it?

Your spreading racist links.

Here we go again!

Point out the "racist" link, please.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm

The LTTE are not muslims. I am hence refuting Kiwi's vague generalisation.

Right, now i get it.

Are they Hindus? I should know i suppose, was there only a year and a half ago :-?

Nevertheless, here's how to respond to those that shout it out:

The "racism" canard.

Same "racist" site. Great read, IMO. :yep:

:up:

The Tamils are predominately Hindu but by no means would it be accurate to say that the LTTE are driven primarily by religion for one fact being that about 15% of them are Christian. The LTTE have made little appeal to religious motives via it's propoganda machine for the simple reason it didn't want to alienate that 15% support from within its own Tamil ranks. Instead the driving force behind the terrorist group LTTE and its nature is an ethno-nationalist one. Unfortunately the principle non-violent aspects of their religion Hindusim (those aspects being ahimsa and satyagraha), are ignored or overidden.

If you were in Sri Lanka a year and a half ago then you may have been lucky because at that time a ceasefire existed from February 2002 (armistace declared) until about mid July 2004 when a LTTE female suicide bomber blew herself up and murdered seven people. By the way the LTTE hold the award for the highest number of female suicide bomber attacks and comprise over 30% of all suicide bombings conducted by the LTTE.

I wish I could add something pointful to this thread, but I can't really think of anything pointful.

I'm quite certain though, that if there wasn't as much oil as there is in the middle east that the various Western nations would have little interest in solving the Middle East's problems. I think they would be quite content to let them massacre each other. Save for the whole 911 thing anyway, the US wanted their pint of blood and they got it with the "liberation" of Afghanistan.

I still can't figure out how Osama managed to escape that one. If I was in command of that operation, I would have nuked every hole in the ground in the country until I vaporized him or he decided it might be a good idea to surrender before his little country starts to glow in the dark. Of course, that's just me. That's why I'm not in charge of anything important. ;)

The official Canadian Extremist. :rock:

Hot damn some of you guys. This place has become sooo radical.
Just when I am turning kinda moderate. You make me look like a treehugger f.c.o.l. No problem, I dig it :lol:

Actually, I think that its more reactionary than radical. Radical would be a leftist view which would probably aim more towards appeasement at this point in history, where as the extreme rightist view (reactionary) would call for the elimination of the new threat so that things could go back to the way that they were.

Semantics. Anyway, elimination got a pretty radical ring to it, huh ? :lol:

Those posters would be huge, because that man is huge.