SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   White House debt talks collapse (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=185911)

Armistead 07-26-11 08:51 AM

I really thought a short term deal would be reached, maybe not.

Both parties have spent us into this mess. The problem is many in the US see the elite getting ever richer why millions each year fall into poverty. Our middle class is being destroyed.

mookiemookie 07-26-11 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Armistead (Post 1713352)
Both parties have spent us into this mess.

Indeed. Anyone who uses this situation as an excuse to rail only against Obama or the Democrats is a partisan hack not worth your time.

Quote:

Yet the speaker, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell all voted for major drivers of the nation’s debt during the past decade: Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts and Medicare prescription drug benefits. They also voted for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, that rescued financial institutions and the auto industry.

Together, a Bloomberg News analysis shows, these initiatives added $3.4 trillion to the nation’s accumulated debt and to its current annual budget deficit of $1.5 trillion.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...-on-obama.html

Armistead 07-26-11 09:25 AM

We have a nasty system. Corporations keep moving jobs overseas and instead of investing in what jobs they could here, they invest in stock here and abroad. It's a big ponzi scheme to say less taxes for them creates jobs overhere, we gave them the big Bush cuts and they moved more jobs overseas, we gave them the tax holiday, cut jobs here and moved more overseas. It should be obvious with any profits, they will invest them abroad.

The more jobs we lose, the more people go into poverty and need social programs. The more jobs corporations make overseas, the more social help people will demand here. We'll, we can't afford them.

Fubar.

mookiemookie 07-26-11 09:27 AM

If the U.S. defaults, millions more will lose their jobs. Possibly me included.

Onkel Neal 07-26-11 09:40 AM

So, I got an email from someone I know, a young MC rider, who asked me "By the way, what's your take on this? Maybe you can explain it to me a bit, sure doesn't seem like a good sign."

Here's my response, which I invite you (left & right wingers) to critique.

Quote:

It’s not a good sign at all. The United States has always been the most secure and reliable economy since the Great Depression, the world’s leader. But with the debt reaching ~15 trillion and the government spending more and more money they* don’t have, the credit rating agencies are threatening to downgrade our Triple A rating, something that has never happened. The President wants Congress to raise the debt limit so the government can borrow more money (which adds to the federal debt). This has been done many times in the past and govt. borrowing makes sense in certain economic situations, but many feel we have reached the point where we should not keep borrowing (which is essentially a tax on future generations). At this time, the interest on the debt, just the interest the govt (taxpayers) have to pay to the holders of our debt, is somewhere around $240 billion each year. That’s just amazing: The National Park Service budget is $3 billion annually, NASA’s budget is $18 billion.

So, here we are, many Republicans and some Democrats do not want to raise the debt limit this time unless Congress and President Obama agree to significant spending cuts and other ways to curb debt. I completely agree with this, most people say they do (until they see a cut in their services). The big standoff now is Republicans, under pressure from Tea Party activists, want to force the President to make large spending cuts without raising taxes on the wealthy; they say these tax hikes will hurt the economy (that’s a whole nother debate in itself!). The President wants tax hikes to go with the cuts. Naturally, he wants tax increases on people earning more than, say, $250,000 a year. As you may guess, there are not millions and millions of voters who fall in that category, (it’s around 6 million people out of 300 million in the country) so they do not have the voting numbers to affect him in his re-election. BTW, these people currently provide over 45% of the revenues for the govt, if I am not mistaken.




*The government spends money on roads, entitlement programs, national defense, social security, etc. because people want services. Democrats traditionally spend the most, because their voters are usually blue-collar and low income, and they want govt. to “do something for us”. Democrats favor more taxes on “the wealthy “to pay for services that are primarily used by the “poor” and middle class. Republicans generally favor smaller govt and less spending, and lower taxes, but under Bush 2 they were as guilty for overspending as Democrats.

Bear in mind, I am not an expert on this subject.

Armistead 07-26-11 10:48 AM

Neal, I think you're leaving out what made this country the greatest nation on earth, we built a strong middle class. How was this done, strong regulation that gave workers a fair shake, min wages, benefits, safety protections, breaking monoploies, fair tax codes, trade laws,..on and on.
We had the highest tax rates when we built the middle class and social services were low.

The problem with less regulation and taxes is we think the elite will do the right thing, it doesn't and hasn't worked that way in decades and won't in a global market. We did lessen regulations, tax cuts under Bush, trade laws, NAFTA, etc..told this would create mass jobs, it did the reverse. Study what happened the last corporate holiday, jobs were lost, profits were invested in stock here...no jobs created.

What it did was build and elite class where about 10% now hold 80% of all real wealth. Millions forced into poverty, no health insurance, etc. Both parties saw all the wealth going one direction, so the answer was more social services to keep americans calm why the rich got richer. Now the GOP wants to keep the rich richer and I assume use the herd mentality and let the poor die off. However, the number in poverty has now exceeded what can be paid. The answer, do what we did to create a strong middle class before, but sadly corporate america owns both parties now.

Many really do seem to believe the more breaks you give corporations, the more they will give back.

Our government failed us as the economy went global, instead of setting law to make a global economy work for us, they sold out to special interest and it now only works for a few. Neither party is addressing this, the GOP wants it to continue, so do the Dems, they just want the elite to pay for the social programs since they get so much favor to gain wealth.

Every leading economist, all extreme wealthy men like Gates, Buffet, Trump says our future will be a two class society. Many today still live a middle class life, but they do so in debt, they trust employers for med insurance, etc... Facts show another crisis could throw another 50 million americans into poverty. Studies say another 50 million will lose med insurance in the next decade, but the rich will get even richer. We even here some GOP members like Bachman that want to get rid of min. wage..

Instead of bringing back jobs here the correct way, by undoing all the mess that created the problem, the GOP is saying Americans must get down to the working levels in third world nations.
That we must accept $2 per hour, no benefits, no safety regulation, etc.. If congress isn't willing to bring back laws that keeps jobs here, then no matter what breaks you give corporations they will do business where they can the cheapest. It's very dangerous to use US wealth and assets creating stronger economies in nations that may one day want to run us over.

Armistead 07-26-11 11:00 AM

I also think it's a joke to say 50-60% of americans pay no taxes. They may not pay it through payroll, but the government gets it other ways. Before I became disabled, the last year I worked I was down to 70K a year. I kept records of all taxes I paid, FICA, property, gas tax, phone tax, sales tax, electric tax, etc... 42% of my income went to taxes... My guess is those numbers would hold down to 30K a year.

Just check, for every product or service you buy there will be a line somewhere with a tax included.

mookiemookie 07-26-11 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Armistead (Post 1713421)
I also think it's a joke to say 50-60% of americans pay no taxes. They may not pay it through payroll, but the government gets it other ways. Before I became disabled, the last year I worked I was down to 70K a year. I kept records of all taxes I paid, FICA, property, gas tax, phone tax, sales tax, electric tax, etc... 42% of my income went to taxes... My guess is those numbers would hold down to 30K a year.

Just check, for every product or service you buy there will be a line somewhere with a tax included.

You're absolutely right. Anyone that parrots that "60% don't pay taxes" line is either ignorant or willfully trying to deceive you. Everyone who earns any income or purchases anything at all pays taxes. And the corporations pass their taxes on to you, the consumer:

Quote:

On Friday, Congress failed to approve the extension of a bill to keep the Federal Aviation Administration running. Among other things, that meant the agency no longer had the authority to impose the various federal taxes that airlines add to the price of each ticket.

So as of 12:01 a.m. Saturday, the federal government began losing an estimated $25 million a day in tax revenue.

But did airlines simply pass on this savings to customers?

No, they did not.

Last week, evidently in anticipation of the tax’s expiring, some airlines quietly began raising fares — on average, roughly by the same amount as the federal taxes. Others did the same over the weekend, and most of the rest joined in on Monday.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/26/bu...es-expire.html

Onkel Neal 07-26-11 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Armistead (Post 1713421)
I also think it's a joke to say 50-60% of americans pay no taxes.

Ah, I didn't say that.

AVGWarhawk 07-26-11 11:53 AM

Quote:

It's very dangerous to use US wealth and assets creating stronger economies in nations that may one day want to run us over.
Never a truer statement!

gimpy117 07-26-11 05:42 PM

nail was struck on the heard Amistead. We can't expect to bring this country back from the brink with only a few holding so much wealth.

Tchocky 07-26-11 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neal Stevens (Post 1713382)
The big standoff now is Republicans, under pressure from Tea Party activists, want to force the President to make large spending cuts without raising taxes on the wealthy

Just a minor point Neal - it's nothing to do with just the wealthy. Almost all of the Republican House have signed a pledge to never ever raise taxes in any circumstance. Closing loopholes etc is included in this. I'm strongly in agreement with Tom Friedman in saying this is an "abdication of their governing responsibilities in a period of incredibly rapid change and financial stress".

Platapus 07-26-11 06:23 PM

What is interesting is that in all the discussions in the media, there is little mention on the Federal Revenue.

Time is the only magazine I have been able to find that published the numbers indicating that, as a ratio of our GDP, Federal Revenue is the lowest it has been since the early 1950s.

This is why reports on the tax rate is misleading. Tax rates are only a place where tax laws and tax lawyers start from. With all the deductions and loopholes the effective tax rate is lower.

It was a most interesting and informative article in Time.

Before we start talking about raising taxes, perhaps we need to start closing the deductions/loopholes to raise the Federal Revenue at the same time we cut Federal Spending.

Madox58 07-26-11 06:31 PM

Quote:

It's very dangerous to use US wealth and assets
creating stronger economies in nations that may one day want to run us over.
Too Late.
We assisted Japan and other Countries to do just that!
Then We passed Laws that allowed Jobs to pour out of the U.S.A.
all the while giveing huge breaks to the Companies that did just that.

Now it's getting close to 'Pay the Piper Time'.

gimpy117 07-26-11 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platapus (Post 1713747)
Before we start talking about raising taxes, perhaps we need to start closing the deductions/loopholes to raise the Federal Revenue at the same time we cut Federal Spending.

they still think fo that as an increase. and any increases will have team R holing. :shifty:

Platapus 07-26-11 07:39 PM

Perhaps, this fiasco may convince people to vote for the person and not just the initial behind a candidate's name.

It really is time to get some adults in congress who are truly interested in running the country and not just party politics



:har::har::har::har::har::har::har:

Like that will ever happen in America. I kill myself sometimes.

Madox58 07-26-11 07:45 PM

Yea, I'll spend 100 Million for a Position that only pays what?
A Million a year for 4 years?
Think about that!

nikimcbee 07-26-11 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by privateer (Post 1713817)
Yea, I'll spend 100 Million for a Position that only pays what?
A Million a year for 4 years?
Think about that!

They like to freebase the power.:dead: They should pay all of those guys minimum wage and no benefits.

Schöneboom 07-26-11 08:17 PM

Hoo-Yeah, let's go even deeper in debt and print even more money! At the rate we're going, we'll all be rolling in dough, like this!

http://www.caseyresearch.com/sites/d...es/image23.jpg

Madox58 07-26-11 08:24 PM

It just pisses me off the Gov can print money.
But if I do it it's a Crime!!

My printers are pretty good!
:haha:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.