Quote:
Originally Posted by mookiemookie
(Post 1655425)
I don't hate them, but I'm not putting my rights in jeopardy because I want to be a nice guy. There are great cops and bad cops out there, and you don't know which one you're dealing with when they stop you or come knocking on your door. That's why I take the say nothing route.
|
Quite so.
Had I followed what two traffic police had leaned on me to say, I'd have a criminal record now.
But no, they were set on doing more than just their job; which should have been to give me a producer and send me on my way - should I fail to meet the requirements of said producer, the courts would deal with me appropriately - that was not good enough for them though.
I spent almost an hour in the back of a panda car being threatened with the law and spoken to in a coercive manner, all because I did not have the correct 'papers' (which I was not obliged to carry anyway), whilst these two goons thought they'd earn some brownie points back at the station. In their eyes I was guilty of an offence and they were determined to pursue that regardless of the facts.
Right or wrong, that incident coloured my view of the police, all police, from then on.
I had been brought up to respect the office of the law, and for the most part still do so, but I have no illusions that it is there for my benefit if push should come to shove. Too many young gung-ho officers who are far too arrogant and cocky to deserve the respect of the man in the street.... standards are obviously lacking, as some of the old boys I have had encounters with have been, for the most part, quite reasonable people and not facsimiles of 2 dimensional action figures you see in american cop shows (fictional and that dog bounty hunter thing).
Stuff happens on youtube and everyone gets all bent out of shape from one side or another. Fact is (and no offence to anyone previous or currently serving - besides it should not be uncomfortable to hear this if you're a genuinely dedicated professional) I do not trust the police to act in my interests, based upon my own personal experience noted above and in other situations. This, I think, is partly to do with current legislation and how certain laws are made and how they are enforced. It's not just a dislike of authority on some arbitrary point.
You may not like my view, but it's not your job to like it, and any man or woman acting as a professional will clearly see past that and understand that this is just another part of the job they must accept: as a representative of the state and by extension, if people don't trust the state, they will not trust you, no matter your values and integrity as an individual, they will see a uniform and all that it does or does not represent.
Three other things worth saying - literacy, and the shocking lack of it with most of the current officers I have met, and failure to qualify to understand the law that they are supposed to uphold. PCSO's are a shining paragon of these deficits, but I'll not go there. And finally, fingerprints and dna being retained following arrest and release without charge... to my mind something is very very wrong there. All of those people who peddle the 'nothing to hide nothing to fear' line of nonsense had better keep their mouths shut and behave in a meek and compliant manner when they eventually fall foul of their own maxim.
We have already seen how the law in the UK has changed with the effect of criminalising large parts of the community, so whilst you might be a law abiding citizen today, you might find yourself a criminal tomorrow - I firmly lay that at the door of meddling politicians and ill considered legislation.
Perhaps I can sum it up best by saying I trust no-one (except a few blood relatives) to look out for me and mine - foolish and misplaced trust (blind loyalty, if you will), be it in authority or those you might feel a certain loyalty for, is asking for trouble.
That's a pretty dim view of the world, I'll admit. But as Ducimus has just said, nobody ever said life was fair; a sentiment that works for all walks of life, be you an ordinary bloke, a copper or a politician.
EDIT:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13268633
Quote:
"To many, today's verdict will seem like a statement of the blindingly obvious, however this fails to take account of the significant and many obstacles faced by the family over the last two years to get to this decision.
"The CPS will now review whether a prosecution will be brought following today's verdict and the way in which the evidence has been clarified during the inquest process."
|
This is exactly the sort of thing that makes me edgy when it comes to accepting the explanations of authority and law enforcement. This and other high profile cases where law abiding citizens have been killed by police or died in police custody, whilst often with the most complex and difficult circumstances I'll grant you, none the less leaves me ill at ease.
Anyone remember the lies told by senior police figures regarding the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes? This even extended to doctoring photos of the man to make him look more like the suspect they were really after, and finally the grossest insult to an innocent man shot dead by police was for the story that came out later on in the investigation into menezes killing, alleging that he had rapped a woman, all to discredit his innocence and to divert blame in a catastrophic ---- up by many ground level and senior policemen and intelligence organisations.
There was no conviction for his killing, and I hold no serious hope that the family of Ian Tomlinson will see one either.