No you didn't. You're not the fish that I was referring to. Looking to get insulted much? Try some reading comprehension next time.

What discussion? You commented on something that I said to another person about a third person, neither of which was you. That's not a discussion.

What claim? I said that I think that Assange is a criminal. Am I not entitled to my opinion? How about you show why you think my opinion means that I also favor silencing concentration camp survivors like Catfish implied.

Right, valid point. The way I see it you made a totally inaccurate statement and called me a coward. I don't see much in the way of counterarguments or justification in that either.

Now you're just making things up. Show me where I have called anyone a nazi, especially you.

Only if you really want to be because he was not referring to any specific individual, most certainly not you but that's ok you go ahead and feel insulted.

Here was me thinking he was changing his sexual orientation/gender :doh:

Having read the link I think there is something 'not quite right' about both of them....something odd going or having gone on.

For the WIN!:up: Made me LOL.

Did I call you a pig?

The same advice applies equally to you.

One should never wrestle with a pig in mud. Both parties get dirty and you soon realize that the pig enjoyed it more than you did. :know:

Oh er, ahem,... Ah so now I'm a pig? A trolling pig?:nope:



























:DL

Ah yes, i may be a pig, or a fish. But this was Platapus who called me that, anyway.

Back to topic:
What i mean is that you seem to like to kill the messenger rather than the people who obviously did commit crimes. Ah yes, for the greater good, i know.
This has been the excuse for a$$holes for milleniums, and is in no way different from today's China, or North Corea.

But honestly, to all people who raise their voice here to kill Assange via your neat devices like predator drones, or whatever:

This is so cowardly you cannot even imagine what I think of you :yep:

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y17.../predadork.jpg

:O:

Thanks for reading,
Catfish

Call me a coward to my face and you won't have to imagine what I think of you sir. :yep:

It keeps getting better and better, Jim. :DL

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/pict...pictureid=3636

:har:

I'm not going to have to put you all in the time out corner am I?

Ah, sex flounders.

Blowing him up with an armed drone just seems too obvious. If the gubmint really wants him dead he'll just disappear under mysterious circumstances. That would be my guess, anyway. :yep:

I don't think i wanna see one of those

When the messenger breaks laws in delivering his message, then yes, I believe he needs to be punished. I assume the phrase "killing the messenger" is only a cliche. I don't feel that any crimes Assange may have committed warrant the death penalty. :nope:

The crimes committed by all parties are totally separate from each other. It may be true that crimes were committed by the government officials. If so, then they should be brought to trial and evidence presented and evaluated.

However, any crimes that the government officials may or may not have committed are totally independent of the crimes Assange may or may not have committed.

A consequentialist viewpoint in this context is not appropriate in my opinion.

:yeah: Awesome!

I guess the Predadork is the contemporary manifestation of what we called Wizzos. Wizzos were weapons control officers. They road, as cargo, in the back seat of two seater such as the F-4. Wizzos were notorious for trying to pass themselves off as pilots to impress people, especially baghags.

I had the misfortune to working next to a wizzo during an exercise in Korea. I just wanted to tell him "dude, you ain't got no radiator! You are a Wizzo!"

The more things change, the more they stay the same. :up: