he was right not to take major heed. It was a stunt. nothing more.

Hellua good stunt drawing all those pepole together.

If he did ignore the rally, he is either a fool or an arrogant so and so. I think he is not telling the truth. Certainly his senior political advisor, David Axelrod, briefed him on the rally. If he didn't he is even more incompetant than Obama himself.

Oh he did not ignore the rally, he is one arrogant(unwarranted arrogance for sure) person but surely he was briefed on the rally at the very least.The dismissive attitude is called saving face, we all do it from time to time, act like something that bothers use does not so not to give our opponents satisfaction .Let's face it, he's most likely going down like a Thai hooker in 2012 and most of his cohorts will joing the unemployed come November.


Tribesman, the war on terror was not a meanlingless tripe, it was a phrase to describe the campaign to fight global terrorism, esp Islamic terrorism.

I am not against muslims or their mosques, they want to practice their silly belief system it's okay.What I am against is catering to Muslims, they come here and should assimilate, not expect special treatment as some bleeding hearts would give them.They should also be sensitive to things such as 9/11 as Americans and not build a mosque near there.The thing is the people building the mosque two blocks from ground zero are lead by an Imam who has made anti US statements, the mosque is a giant "F U" to the USA and brain dead overtolerant Liberals do not realize that or just do not care enough to be against it.

Bush catered more to them than he should have but nothing like obama and Bush did not have a muslim backround or muslim ties.Obama is not capable of being objective when dealing with issues relating to Islam, he has proven this.

:har:

So its a law enforcement effort not a war, it isn't really global either and it isn't on terror only on some terrorists.
So the phrase war on terror is without doubt meaningless tripe as it conveys really none of the elements it contains.

Can you run through them?
You will see the problem, how can they be anti US when they are true?

Actually the rants against the building by the intollerant braindead who have been whipped up to a frenzy by the media are a giant FU to america and all it stands for. But they don't even realize it.

No , but you have proven repeatedly that you are unable to be objective in any of your views on your nation and its politics, you make Steamwake look as though he is using a measured bi-partisan approach to issues

yeah but who organized it? Real civil leaders aren't T.V personalities.
The only reason those people came was to see Sara and Beck.

Try it with some random man and woman and see how many come.

not only that, but now that obama has done so much to ruin this country (and in record time no less) that nobody can ever say carter was the absolute worst president ever because that honor will now forever belong to Obama

re
 

[QUOTE=Tribesman;1482767]So its a law enforcement effort not a war, it isn't really global either and it isn't on terror only on some terrorists.
So the phrase war on terror is without doubt meaningless tripe as it conveys really none of the elements it contains.

no it's a war, not a law enforcement action.Law Enforcement handles it in the US because we cant have the military doing so but its a military campaign against global terrorism.


Can you run through them?
You will see the problem, how can they be anti US when they are true?

I recall he said Bin Laden was made in the USA.That is not true, some pissant wack job islamic trash conspired to kill thousands of innocent people but it's the US's fault? WRONG! Blame the victim eh? There are other statements I've read basically talking down to the very country that tolerates his ridiculous religion etc.You've prob heard them as well.


Actually the rants against the building by the intollerant braindead who have been whipped up to a frenzy by the media are a giant FU to america and all it stands for. But they don't even realize it.

NO! The people standing up are doing so because they recognize while under the consitution they may have a right to build that mosque but they have the responsibility to honor those killed by extremnists but that would only make sense if they were some of the good muslims seeking to assimilate to the US while maintaining their beliefs.This Imam and no doubt those who will stock this house of jihad will be preaching anti us messages to try and indoctrinate new comers as well as laughing:har::har: at how foolish the infidels tolerance of it's enemies is.

The people standing up realize that we can not be so tolerant that we allow threats to go unchecked while the libtards think we can inspire these people to be friendly through our tolerance, that is just rubbish and nothing more than appeasement!

Sir Winston Churchill said it best "An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last"

The giant FU as said is building a mosque that was going to be named Cordoba House.You may skew history to suit your arguments but you do know history.I assume you know about Cordoba and what naming a mosque/community center etc implies? esp in a western city and esp so close to the 9/11 attacks.


I am quite objective but do not follow your liberal line of thinking which does not suit the US best interests so you try to do what liberals do, slander etc.

It is acting against criminals for crimes, terrorism is a crime you know. Its law enforcement.

Can you run through the actual statements not just some crap you make up as you go along?
After all as you are talking about what was said you must know what he said:rotfl2:

Yes:har:

:haha::haha::haha::haha:

Okay Tribesman here you go, watch the video its in the scumbag Imam's own words.The Imam claims the US policies are to blame.Wahh Wahh lets blame the real victims and call muslims the victims.Obviously, he is a shill for radical Islam.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...utes-interview

And you somehow think that they are not?
Oh dear your education seems to be completely lacking.
Where would you like to start, Saudi arabia or Afghanistan? Pakistan or Yemen maybe?
Its a simple thing which you can't grasp, if you support dictatorships and fund terrorists they will inevitably turn round and bite your arse when you ain't looking, when they do turn round and bite you you are an accesory to the attack because you set up the rabid dogs to bite people in the first place.

Do you speak english ? can you read it?
Your words certainly suggest that you can't comprehend the language

Its quite simple, you object to a statement he made.
If the statement is true then what the hell are you objecting to?
If you think the statement is false then what planet are you from?

Are we dealing with Islam, or a completely screwed-up vision of Islam? :yep:

There is wisdom in those words. Everything the United States does in the form of hegemony has effects and reactions. Some intended and some unintended. With the short sightedness of the American culture, our foreign policy often does not go deeper than what is good for us now -- ignoring the consequences in the future.