SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - Latest Q and A nonsense from Ubisoft .

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)

- Silent Hunter 5 (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=244)

- - Latest Q and A nonsense from Ubisoft . (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=160579)

I hope the devs dont read this thread...they DO put alot of dedication into its creation and go into great lengths to make the best sim, but like so many other things they are restricted by boundries not under their control.

I second McBeth's notion.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pythos (Post 1245092)

I second McBeth's notion.

You want to kill the King of Scotland?!

I like what McBeck had to say personally.... :haha:

(just teasin pythos!:up:)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Safe-Keeper (Post 1244700)

Honestly still don't see the problem. I mean, how many of you hate Falcon 4.0 Allied Force because you can only fly variations of the F-16, with the plus side being a nearly 100% complete cockpit with every switch, button, dial and computer feature implemented? Lemme see a show of hands.

Absolutely no disagreement with this statement...assuming that SH5 turns out to be every bit as comprehensive as Falcon 4.0: AF. I have stated elsewhere that if SH5 turns out to be a proper study sim along the lines of Falcon 4.0 or similar games, then I think the majority of player concerns surrounding the one U-boat type will quickly disappear. Because for SH5 to achieve the same status as Falcon 4: AF, then all the major issues that have been raised over the last few years regarding the gameplay elements will have been addressed. I mean, one can't just limit the playable models to one to claim study sim status. ;)

If, however, SH5 turns out not to be a true study sim, then your comparison is apples and oranges: you may as well ask Lada drivers to stop complaining about having no air conditioning because their cars still have the same number of wheels as Rolls Royces. ;):doh:

Now remind me, how many pages is the Falcon 4.0: AF manual?

760 :shifty:

I think the ongoing comparisons to Falcon 4.0: AF need to stop until we can assess how detailed and comprehensive SH5 is with just the one U-boat type...and this means beyond the pretty 3D interior...only then can we be sure that we are comparing apples and apples.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webster (Post 1244872)

so if ubi isnt telling you anything where else can you get the answers to your questions but from someone who has the game on their computer
(re: wait till someone buys it and they can answer your questions)

or you can call the phsycic hotline

Or wait for the BIG ANNOUNCEMENT? :hmmm:

Quote:

Originally Posted by McBeck (Post 1244940)

Who cares if they read it . Its about the quality of qanda aspertainstothe subsim member . I am not knocking the devs in any way shape or foem .

Quote:

Originally Posted by sober (Post 1245332)

Who cares if they read it . Its about the quality of qanda aspertainstothe subsim member . I am not knocking the devs in any way shape or foem .

I care. I want them to be motivated to do their best in building this game. Some of these comments here would make me think "Why do I even bother working nights and weekends on this game - the community dont even acknowledges the effort the dev team puts in this"

Quote:

Originally Posted by McBeck (Post 1245362)

I applaud what the devs have done . There qanda sucks bigtime .

Quote:

Originally Posted by sober (Post 1243552)

I have first go to do a farting mod right .

What kind of tone are you shooting for? Dry? Wet? Ewwwwww.....:-?