Skybird |
09-12-07 04:10 PM |
It is silly to rule out from the beginning any resistance that harms innocent and civilians. I never would do that - eventually i only rule out to intentionally harm innocent and civilians (this is what separates me from islamic terrorists).
but once i have identified a valid target (=enemy) and for whatever my reasons are consider it a must to defeat this enemy, I would not accept anything or anyryone to come between him and me, and if it would be god himself trying to stop me - i would kill him, and then my enemy. That is fighting spirit, and determination. Everything less is a laugh in an empty room, and nobody hears you ecxept yourself.
Why do Palestinian and Islamic terrorists, and other thugs and pigs intentionally hide behind civilian people, offices, buildings? why do they intentionally seek the crowd to launch their mortars, why do they store their ammo and weapons in schools and hospitals? Because they know that this protects them from most Western defense against their murderous deeds.
according to the logic of those saying we shall not defend ourselves if it means to harm those they are hiding behind, we would be left totally defenseless, and have no right to resist at all. They even do not think about the fact that they cannot offer an alternative themselves, a realistic, practical alternative that is. so in the end, these people already have given up from the very beginning. they are no partners in negotiation that way - they are only prey. Just tell them you are willing to use force, and they will immediately surrender, for using force by themselves they have ruled out.
Can't get more silly than this.
One could even push it further and refer to a Samurai's spirit. He would not even hesitate to go for his enemy if the risk that he will be killed himself is significant.
Either you fight, or you don't. Everything else is dead brain and baby poo-poo.
If that is to brutal a truth for an enemy, he better don't start to engage a man thinking like this. Nobody forces him to look for trouble.
I must admit that over the past years I got extremely tired and disgusted by this kind of people who are willing to destroy all of Wetsern culture and civilization if only that means not having to fight a "conflict". They shoulder a major share of the responsibility that islam is allowed to commence it's biggest offense since the 10th century. Back then Islam was stopped not before having reached the heart of France, and Austria, and almost all Southern europe being conquered. This time they will take it all - thanks to the endlessly wellmeaning, unlimited tolerant aesthetes in our middle who cannot even spell the word "conflict" without starting to stutter.
A civilization that cannot defend itself or does not wish to defend itself, is a civilization doomed to die.
I civilised attitude is useless in the face of an opponent having no civilised attitude, only the determination to be as brutal as necessary to push his cause. So you eithe rbrake him - or you get broken.
But that is too harsh a truth for some to consider.
|