SeaQueen |
01-07-06 05:16 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by WargamerScott
Thank you for providing that explanation. While I have been playing hobby wargames since I was 13, I never had an opportunity to really learn how professional wargames differ in usage (other than from books). Your explanation was very informative! And I envy you.... ;)
|
Thank you!
Companies like the Center for Naval Analysis, Wagner Inc., Systems Planning and Analysis, CACI, SAIC, Mitre, RAND, etc. etc. do a lot of this sort of work. I swear what got me my job as that my background is in physics and I've played Harpoon since I was little. Send 'em your resume. CNA's Operations Evaluation Group is actually particularly neat because they send people to sea regularly. The company that I work for doesn't send people to sea that often, although so far, I've still gotten to spend some time aboard the USS ROBERT G BRADLEY, the USS ANZIO and the USS IWO JIMA. It's a cool job.
Quote:
Maybe they have an eye on both civie and military markets at some point in the future? Like TACOPS?
|
Possibly. It's hard to say. Right now the big buzz word is COTS (commerical off the shelf). The idea is that the military doesn't have to spend a million dollars developing a new toaster when they can go down to Walmart and get one. I think that video games are developing sufficent depth that people are getting interested in using them. I mean, heck, if you read Fleet Tactics and Coastal Combat he even says that there's an awful lot to be learned with contemporary video games. We'll see.
I think a lot of whether things are adopted or not depends a lot on the specifics of the software.
|