SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Islamic extremism and the theory of a Clash of Civilizations (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=86144)

Kissaki 11-02-05 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Avon Lady
The picture sequence of the child is not of a punishment for stealing. RETRACTION.

Well, I'm glad that wasn't actually the punishment of a little boy. The actual story behind the photos, however, is not much more comforting. :huh:

The Avon Lady 11-02-05 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Konovalov
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Avon Lady
The picture sequence of the child is not of a punishment for stealing. RETRACTION.

Bravo. Thank you for the retraction. Things are not always what they seem. :)

And the kid was only 8. Now, had he been 14....................

Konovalov 11-02-05 02:31 PM

And from Amnesty International a record of countries executing child offenders: http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engact500042003

Quote:

In the nine years between 1994 and 2002 Amnesty International recorded 19 executions of child offenders in five countries, a tiny fraction of the worldwide total of 22,588 executions recorded in 70 countries during the same period. A further execution was carried out in April 2003, bringing to 20 the number of recorded executions of child offenders since 1994. Thirteen of the 20 executions were in the USA. Within the USA there is a similar concentration of executions. Although 22 states currently provide for the death penalty against child offenders, the 22 executions of child offenders since 1977 have been carried out in just seven states. Sixteen of the 22 executions - over two thirds - were in Texas and Virginia. (See United States of America: Indecent and internationally illegal - the death penalty against child offenders, pp. 38-40, 99.) The 22 states that allow the use of the death penalty against child offenders are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, Nevada, Oklahoma, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Wyoming.


Of the seven countries which have executed child offenders since 1990, two - Pakistan and Yemen - have since raised the minimum age to 18 in their laws. Saudi Arabia has since stated that it does not impose capital punishment on "children who have not attained the age of majority" (see below), and the authorities are not known to have executed any child offenders since 1992. There have been sporadic reports of such executions in Iran, but Iran has denied executing child offenders (see below). The two executions recorded in Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of Congo respectively were both of children convicted by special or military courts whose procedures did not conform to international norms for a fair trial; For details of cases, see Children and the death penalty: Executions worldwide since 1990, pp. 6-15.

neither country has admitted executing child offenders (see Appendix 3). The only country that openly continues to execute child offenders within the framework of its regular criminal justice system is the USA.
Care to add anything to the topic of discssion being the theory of a clash of civilizations?

August 11-02-05 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kissaki
Quote:

Originally Posted by August
Well i don't think you'll find the penalty for stealing is having ones arm run over by a truck in any nations written law, Iran included. But similar things do happen in all Muslim countries and without exception they are either insufficiently discouraged or completely ignored by the societies those respective governments are supposed to represent.

That I can agree with. Though it's still not something that regularly happens in every Muslim country.

That's a matter of debate but it brings us back to the concept of the Muslims cleaning their own house.

Iceman 11-02-05 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Konovalov
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Avon Lady
Surah 5, verse 38:

As to the thief, Male or female, cut off his or her hands: a punishment by way of example, from Allah, for their crime: and Allah is Exalted in power.

You don't get it, do you? Are your links the results of religious or philosophical or institutionalized convictions? Do national and religious leaders advocate intentionally inflicting such acts on others?

You just don't get it.
Quote:

I take it that you voted yes to the poll question?
Yes.

The reference to male or female in the Holy Qu'ran for the Surah and Ayah that you quoted tie in with the Sharia and this is applicable if that person is a healthy adault, i.e. NOT a minor or a mentally disturbed person. This rule applies to hadd or hudud, tazir, and qisas crimes which are basically the groupings for the seriousness of the crime.

And further with regards to Ayah 38 of Surah 5 where this part of the Qu'ran touches on jurisprudence. The Canon Law jurists are not unanimous as to the value of the property stolen, but the vast majority hold that petty thefts are exempt from punishment such as the cutting off of a hand.

Perhaps you don't get it AL. May be you should stick to the Torah and Halacha.

Here is the part that is subject to interpretation I guess? Where does it say if they are healthy or where is it exactly that describes where or how to divide this passage?Please give some actual references not just your view.

To me this is a very clear passage.This is what I read from that passage...

Quote:

Surah 5, verse 38:

As to the thief, Male or female, cut off his or her hands: a punishment by way of example, from Allah, for their crime: and Allah is Exalted in power.
Hum it says for a thief cut off some limbs....Am I just dreaming this or is this what it says?

Please Please show me where this is not to be followed as punishment for thieving.

Please!

Quote:

but the vast majority hold that petty thefts are exempt from punishment such as the cutting off of a hand.
Again where in the Holy book you follow says the vast majority does not have to follow this ..or is this another assumption on your part?

Hitman 11-03-05 06:14 AM

All kind of horrible punishments and atrocities can be found in all holy books of all major religions...the old aztecs of Mexico even threw young ladies to mud holes, vulcans and ripped the heart of a living man alive as a sacrifice regularly....

What should be so strange about that, if you think that all those books were written during the early middle age at most, sometimes even older?

Didn't the jews kill the prostitutes by llapidation (Throwing stones to them)? Just the same as the muslims do with cheating wives....

I have no problem in agreeing that the geographical and sociopolitical situation of today's majority of muslim countries keeps them almost in the middle age in terms of civilization, so the vast majority of Islam is radical. But doesn't mean that there is no possible moderate interpretation of Quran, in my opinion. If we are to interpret the bible literally, we will be doing horrible atrocities, same as they were done in the middle age. I visited once a museum of the spanish holy inquisition and that was even more horrible than those pictures of the Iranian guy posted before.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/spanish/new...00/1379001.stm

Sorry the text is in spanish. Here's the short version in english: Two nuns sentenced to 15 years for helping in the genocide of 7000 people who searched asylum in their church, in Rwanda.

Are they good christians? Is the fact that they commit a crime in the name of God enough to say that the catholic religion is perverted?

Yes in the Islam this is more frequent, quite so when you see the situation in which their civilization lies, in terms of progress.

Do we see images like the punishment of the Iranian child in Turkey nowadays? No? Ain't they muslims? What is the difference between Turkey and Iran, then?

I lived once in germany during a whole month with a turk familiy. That was a summer back when I was in school and we had student exchange. The guy came later to us here at spain. He used to pray regularly to Allah, but did sleep on a bed where a cross was hung above, and did not complaint. He did not complaint if we had pig for lunch (Though my mother asked him repeteadly to cook something else if that offended him), and his answer always was: "I can eat this and see that to correspond your hospitality. Allah does not mind if we do little sacrifices for our friends. The fact that I already suffer eating it, is the correct punishment. It would be a sin if had pleasure and did it voluntarily, but I don't. Allah rewards those who are hospitalary and who are thankful to their friends. This is not an act against my religion but a sign of hospitality from you, and that is what counts."

Sorry, but as long as I can find guys like that, I will not think that it is the Islam itself what is wrong. :hmm:

Sixpack 11-03-05 08:52 AM

deleted

kiwi_2005 11-03-05 08:52 AM

Quote:

america cant expect arab people to just drop thier way of life after thousands of years and adopt "american democracy" that goes against everything america stands for,
True. Although i think America want to make it better for places such as iraq. The truth is theres no way iraq is going to give up there ideas and adopt ours. Can't happen. Democracy in Iraq is gonna fail.

Kissaki 11-03-05 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August
Quote:

That I can agree with. Though it's still not something that regularly happens in every Muslim country.
That's a matter of debate but it brings us back to the concept of the Muslims cleaning their own house.

Taking the law into their own hands? And this is something peculiar to Muslims?

August 11-04-05 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kissaki
Quote:

Originally Posted by August
Quote:

That I can agree with. Though it's still not something that regularly happens in every Muslim country.
That's a matter of debate but it brings us back to the concept of the Muslims cleaning their own house.

Taking the law into their own hands? And this is something peculiar to Muslims?

I didn't say that. Where would you get such an idea?

Kissaki 11-04-05 01:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kissaki
Quote:

Originally Posted by August
Quote:

That I can agree with. Though it's still not something that regularly happens in every Muslim country.
That's a matter of debate but it brings us back to the concept of the Muslims cleaning their own house.

Taking the law into their own hands? And this is something peculiar to Muslims?

I didn't say that. Where would you get such an idea?

Because you keep portraying Muslims as shady characters because they might follow their own particular interpretation of Islam, rather than the actual law. That describes a criminal, following his own views on right or wrong. But your focus is solely on the Muslims, giving the impression that we have no criminals among ethnic Europeans.

darksythe 11-04-05 04:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kapitain
america cant expect arab people to just drop thier way of life after thousands of years and adopt "american democracy" that goes against everything america stands for,

freedom of speech
the initial right to do what you like when you like how you like

ok there are some real bad regiemes but the arab world is the more formed culture on this earth westerners are noobs to the world hence why the extremeists are fighting to save thier culture.

america is invading arab culture and way of life and again democray says you can fight back if your being opressed and this is what they are doing.

there are two major cultures on this planet arab and western both are diffrent both if they callaborated could learn from each other and then prevent stupid wars.

america has summed up the arabs wrong and is fighting the arabs but what no one sees is that the arabs will probably triumph because they have had the past experiance personaly fighting the arab way of life is stupid there are far more arabs than westerners and 3/4 of them willing to fight.

if an arab walked into the white house and took control no one would like it so why should we do that to them?

clash of cultures definatly


EXCUSE ME??? but the last itme i checked the Muslims are very much trying to invade all different aspects of american culture. Not to mention european. A few posts back we were talking about a group of muslims somewhere arguing that owners shouldnt be able to sell liqour out side there own property. Because it offneds them. Of course they would have you believe it was the children they were worried about. I think the initial post in this topic can X that right out of the realm of possabilities.

As far as nOObs to religion go, we are practicing the same religion that was practised in your neck of the woods so many years ago, You remember that christianity started over there(European areas.)

In the past few years our culture has changed dramatically to allow for the "Feelings" of others.

Oh and ive really got to say that it must be nice to have a society that encourages beating your women folk when they dont abide by your rules. Only after you have expressed your feelings about the tings she did wrong. if that doesnt work your supposed to kick her out of the bed for a month, and when all that doesnt work your encouraged to take a stick and beat the living daylights out of her.

Oh and lets not forget about the guy who returned from Mecca thinking his 13 or 14 yr old daughter was no longer a virgin....
And what did he do you may ask????

well quite simple actually, he sat all of his children down duck taped the girl and began to Slit her neck in front of her siblings!! THIS WAS HER FATHER!!!

What is the answer to all of this?

Can anyone say Glass Bowl?

Kissaki 11-04-05 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darksythe
EXCUSE ME??? but the last itme i checked the Muslims are very much trying to invade all different aspects of american culture. Not to mention european. A few posts back we were talking about a group of muslims somewhere arguing that owners shouldnt be able to sell liqour out side there own property. Because it offneds them. Of course they would have you believe it was the children they were worried about. I think the initial post in this topic can X that right out of the realm of possabilities.

This is just journalism. If you cared to quote more of that thread, you'd also see comments to the effect that these complaints were made by a very small (but highly vocal) minority within another minority. And that most Muslims don't mind piggy banks or out door servings of alcohol at all. Hell, I can even mention Christian groups who have made the same sort of complaints over here (with regards to alcohol). So your argument is really not usable, unless you're working for the Sun.

Quote:

As far as nOObs to religion go, we are practicing the same religion that was practised in your neck of the woods so many years ago, You remember that christianity started over there(European areas.)
Thought it started in the Middle East?

Quote:

In the past few years our culture has changed dramatically to allow for the "Feelings" of others.
Yes, we grew less xenophobic for a period after the war. Which I think is a good thing. But now it's coming back.

Quote:

Oh and ive really got to say that it must be nice to have a society that encourages beating your women folk when they dont abide by your rules. Only after you have expressed your feelings about the tings she did wrong. if that doesnt work your supposed to kick her out of the bed for a month, and when all that doesnt work your encouraged to take a stick and beat the living daylights out of her.
It happens all over the world. We just pretend that we don't do it as much.

Quote:

Oh and lets not forget about the guy who returned from Mecca thinking his 13 or 14 yr old daughter was no longer a virgin....
And what did he do you may ask????

well quite simple actually, he sat all of his children down duck taped the girl and began to Slit her neck in front of her siblings!! THIS WAS HER FATHER!!!
This is a cultural thing, and not limited to Islam. You see it, and similar things, as much in Hindu sections of India as well, but it is strictly forbidden by law. Those kinds of traditions are being combatted, but old habits die hard. Because this is not a problem confined to Islam, though, and because this does not occur in every Islamic country, the obvious conclusion must be: It is not a trait of Islam.

Sixpack 11-04-05 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kissaki

This is a cultural thing, and not limited to Islam. You see it, and similar things, as much in Hindu sections of India as well, but it is strictly forbidden by law. Those kinds of traditions are being combatted, but old habits die hard. Because this is not a problem confined to Islam, though, and because this does not occur in every Islamic country, the obvious conclusion must be: It is not a trait of Islam.

Alas, the matter is getting mixed up.

@Kissaki,

Islam only matters to us because it is getting more and more influential in our West. The question and debate is: Does the West want that to happen and if not: Do we still allow it by being liberal and tolerant ? It's our choice !

Islam in the ME and other significant muslim countries is just fine by me. It belongs there for a long time. It doesnt bother me as long as it's a domestic reli-cultural phenomenon there. But if an Iranian president starts the old Jihad rethoric against Israel and possibly seeks nuclear power for apparent reli-political reasons, how can I not be bothered by it ?

The islam-extremists are evidently causing major unrest in the world. And the moderate's silence is quite deafening. Even a blind and deaf person can notice that. Yet, you fail to notice it.

August 11-04-05 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kissaki
Quote:

Originally Posted by August
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kissaki
Quote:

Originally Posted by August
Quote:

That I can agree with. Though it's still not something that regularly happens in every Muslim country.
That's a matter of debate but it brings us back to the concept of the Muslims cleaning their own house.

Taking the law into their own hands? And this is something peculiar to Muslims?

I didn't say that. Where would you get such an idea?

Because you keep portraying Muslims as shady characters because they might follow their own particular interpretation of Islam, rather than the actual law. That describes a criminal, following his own views on right or wrong. But your focus is solely on the Muslims, giving the impression that we have no criminals among ethnic Europeans.

Well you're making several assumptions that are just incorrect. I'm not casting all Muslims as shady characters. Care to detail where i have said or implied such a thing?

As for my focus, please check the title of this thread for clarification as to what I should be focusing on.

Did you mix me up with someone else again?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.