SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Camp Twink - Feminizing boys to be like girls. (Sick) (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=205864)

Oberon 07-19-13 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dowly (Post 2086308)
What a surprise. As I've said plenty of times: This place is a complete mess.

Oh, but it's 'always been this way', and therefore it must always be this way. No matter how low it stoops. :nope:

Still, at least there's the odd diamond in the rough, like your Roman podcasts which I shall continue listening to today. :yep::up:

antikristuseke 07-19-13 06:45 AM

I like turtles and I want to go to camp now.

garren 07-19-13 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skybird (Post 2086294)
http://cuncti.net/

http://sciencefiles.org/

http://genderama.blogspot.de/

For German-tongued readers, some sites that frequently deal with the crime-against-sexual-identity that over here is called genderism, and which is nothing than the revival of ultra-orthodox feminism and the intended discrimination of male humans and male values. It is sickening - and since the early 90s official and integral part of of EU policy-enforcing.

I am not against equal rights (and duties!) for women, I am all fore equality. But to me that means equality before the law, fair chances for both sexes according to their unique characteristics, it does not mean to deny differences and to make equal in form what is not equal in form. I compare to the kind of equality I support for a white and a black person when looking for a job or facing the court: nobody would claim by that equality-demand that there are no whites and blacks by skin colour, and even small differences in physiology between whites ans blacks that doctors even have to take into account when prescribing drugs. Equality for women and men means: justice, not more and not less. But genderism is not about equality, but female dominance, demonising of male qualities, and what makes it worse is that itn is not even a natural feminine quality that should dominate, but a perverted, obsessed, supremacist tyrant with boobs who holds a deep-rooting disgust if not outright hate for what is associated with being male. Genderism presentes this extremist feminism once again, basing on the psychologically and medically undefendable lie that people are born without any sexual preferences or identity and thus can be engineered to be the one or the other sex in all intellectual, emotional, behavioral, motivational and other regards. - WHICH IS TOTAL AND COMPLETE BULLSH!T. Even the existence of homosexuality and trans-sexuality (a male psyche trapped in a female body or the other way around) proves that this feminist claim of a sexual "tabula rasa" is nonsense. But it serves an ideological purpose to spread this propaganda.

Genderism is the revival of extremist feminism of the most hate-filled, the worst, the most supremacist kind. And after having changed the label feminism for genderism, it has become more successful (while deceptive) than ever before. If you follow related developments over here since some longer time - like I do -, then you know how terribly it already is going wrong. The disadvantaging of fathers in family court cases also is a status in which to achieve genderism has had a very decisive word. The discrimination of men is being turned into valid laws more and more, and I do not even mention how politically correct genderistas have started to rape the German language in a bid to delete the male qualities from it. Since this feminist policy works wonderfully in relativising and destroying the institution of family and parents as well, it is neither a surprise that in the wake of this ideological crusade the termini of "mother" and "father" gets deleted as well, nor is it surprising that the political left, eager to destroy bourgeois "family" and replace it with leftist concepts of state-driven collectives.

Long live the differences between men and women! They are what bring us together. Genderism, feminism, chauvinism: let it rot in hell - and those supporting it along with it. I see the danger and predatory nature of these new feminists, and I deal with them accordingly, yes - but I refuse to take them intellectually serious. They are basing almost exclusively on propaganda lies that have been shown - even by moderate and educated feminists! - to be simply wrong so many times before, over and over again, since years and years. And yet their lobby still spreads the same old lies again and again - and more successfull since 15 or 20 years than ever before.


Agreed 100% :up:

MH 07-19-13 07:38 AM

Quote:

Although it is unknown if the kids at the camp will eventually identify as gay or transgender—or even if the way gender and sexuality are defined throughout society will evolve—the camp allows the kids to look at themselves in a completely different way
Have nothing against gays/transgenders or whatever but this is lame idea.
Is this camp for the parents or the kids :03:

I would categorise it as same crap as Toddlers & Tiaras.

Sailor Steve 07-19-13 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dowly (Post 2086308)
What a surprise. As I've said plenty of times: This place is a complete mess.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 2086310)
Oh, but it's 'always been this way', and therefore it must always be this way. No matter how low it stoops. :nope:

So, what do you suggest?

Tchocky 07-19-13 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skybird (Post 2086294)
http://cuncti.net/

http://sciencefiles.org/

http://genderama.blogspot.de/

For German-tongued readers, some sites that frequently deal with the crime-against-sexual-identity that over here is called genderism, and which is nothing than the revival of ultra-orthodox feminism and the intended discrimination of male humans and male values. It is sickening - and since the early 90s official and integral part of of EU policy-enforcing.

I am not against equal rights (and duties!) for women, I am all fore equality. But to me that means equality before the law, fair chances for both sexes according to their unique characteristics, it does not mean to deny differences and to make equal in form what is not equal in form. I compare to the kind of equality I support for a white and a black person when looking for a job or facing the court: nobody would claim by that equality-demand that there are no whites and blacks by skin colour, and even small differences in physiology between whites ans blacks that doctors even have to take into account when prescribing drugs. Equality for women and men means: justice, not more and not less. But genderism is not about equality, but female dominance, demonising of male qualities, and what makes it worse is that itn is not even a natural feminine quality that should dominate, but a perverted, obsessed, supremacist tyrant with boobs who holds a deep-rooting disgust if not outright hate for what is associated with being male. Genderism presentes this extremist feminism once again, basing on the psychologically and medically undefendable lie that people are born without any sexual preferences or identity and thus can be engineered to be the one or the other sex in all intellectual, emotional, behavioral, motivational and other regards. - WHICH IS TOTAL AND COMPLETE BULLSH!T. Even the existence of homosexuality and trans-sexuality (a male psyche trapped in a female body or the other way around) proves that this feminist claim of a sexual "tabula rasa" is nonsense. But it serves an ideological purpose to spread this propaganda.

Genderism is the revival of extremist feminism of the most hate-filled, the worst, the most supremacist kind. And after having changed the label feminism for genderism, it has become more successful (while deceptive) than ever before. If you follow related developments over here since some longer time - like I do -, then you know how terribly it already is going wrong. The disadvantaging of fathers in family court cases also is a status in which to achieve genderism has had a very decisive word. The discrimination of men is being turned into valid laws more and more, and I do not even mention how politically correct genderistas have started to rape the German language in a bid to delete the male qualities from it. Since this feminist policy works wonderfully in relativising and destroying the institution of family and parents as well, it is neither a surprise that in the wake of this ideological crusade the termini of "mother" and "father" gets deleted as well, nor is it surprising that the political left, eager to destroy bourgeois "family" and replace it with leftist concepts of state-driven collectives.

Long live the differences between men and women! They are what bring us together. Genderism, feminism, chauvinism: let it rot in hell - and those supporting it along with it. I see the danger and predatory nature of these new feminists, and I deal with them accordingly, yes - but I refuse to take them intellectually serious. They are basing almost exclusively on propaganda lies that have been shown - even by moderate and educated feminists! - to be simply wrong so many times before, over and over again, since years and years. And yet their lobby still spreads the same old lies again and again - and more successfull since 15 or 20 years than ever before.



Quote:

Originally Posted by Skybird
but I refuse to take them intellectually serious.

Funny that.

garren 07-19-13 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tchocky (Post 2086431)
Funny that.


He has a valid point. Just read this...

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow...162549523.html


He was talking about them changing the German language... Well here they are changing the English language as well.

These people hate men and masculinity so much that they are distancing themselves from any word that ends in "man" or "men" because they feel that these words are sexist towards women. So I guess "women" can't be "wo-men" anymore? And we can't be "hu-man" anymore either? The Navy will have to stop calling them "Seaman" and be PC/gender neutral and call them "Sea person". Wait! Can't call them a "per-son" either because that discriminates against daughters. What nonsense! :nope:

I've read they are even going to alter any and all history records in the city of Seattle to be politically correct/gender neutral as well because feminists whined that women were not given proper recognition in the past so all documents have to be changed. Reminds me of the crap Hitler was doing.:hmm2:

But there's still phrases like "bad guys" of course and those are OK with them because anything that demeans men or makes men out to be villains is still appropriate to them of course.

AVGWarhawk 07-19-13 09:50 AM

Nothing new. Policeman is police person or law enforcement officer. Mailman is mail person or postal worker. PC at it's finest.

Armistead 07-19-13 10:00 AM

This is no better than those radical religious camps. I see anything like this dangerous before puberty. If your kids are gay, let them grow into it at their pace and figure it out for themselves, not screw with their heads before they know better.

The new norm, no norm. I guess the goal of humanity is that we all become multi-racial bi-sexuals.

soopaman2 07-19-13 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Armistead (Post 2086469)
This is no better than those radical religious camps. I see anything like this dangerous before puberty. If your kids are gay, let them grow into it at their pace and figure it out for themselves, not screw with their heads before they know better.

Michele "batboy" Bachmans (thank you Minnesota) husband ran a "pray the gay away" clinic on taxpayer subsidies.

Maybe they can go there for neutralization therapy, hopefully they will stop craving carpets, and pretzel rods, and become ambiguous.

Just pointing out a contrast.

Bigotry flows both ways in this great nation, Americans love to hate each other..

Not me though, I love you guys! :)

Oberon 07-19-13 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve (Post 2086430)
So, what do you suggest?

Well, in this particular instance, given that this thread was started for no purpose other than to stir up hatred against a particular group of people then I would recommend locking it and infracting the op.

Tribesman 07-19-13 11:51 AM

Quote:

Well, in this particular instance, given that this thread was started for no purpose other than to stir up hatred against a particular group of people then I would recommend locking it and infracting the op.
Well I am not sure about that, I think the purpose may be one of projection, in which case the hatred is directed at himself. It does seem a rather common occurance on the subject of homosexuality
As for infracting, well....Giving infractions is gay! So lame. I hate this site......
and it will only lead to another internet forum suicide note which apparently is a plea for help.

soopaman2 07-19-13 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribesman (Post 2086534)
Well I am not sure about that, I think the purpose may be one of projection, in which case the hatred is directed at himself. It does seem a rather common occurance on the subject of homosexuality
As for infracting, well....Giving infractions is gay! So lame. I hate this site......
and it will only lead to another internet forum suicide note which apparently is a plea for help.

A personal plea for help, in a hope to supress the feelings in others he feels so strongly but resists due to societal and/or religious reasons.

It's only gay if you kiss back Garren. :haha:

I though I spouted stupid crap, but this guy makes me look like Stephen Hawking.

garren 07-19-13 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 2086520)
Well, in this particular instance, given that this thread was started for no purpose other than to stir up hatred against a particular group of people then I would recommend locking it and infracting the op.


Whoa! Hold on now. Almost any political thread could be taken as "hate" on here. I don't hate these boys the article is about, nor do I hate gays. I just don't agree with these parents using their sons as political pawns to push their personal agenda. No way in hell are these boys old enough to choose a sexual preference. 3 years old? Come on now.

Red October1984 07-19-13 12:25 PM

Time for a good lock... :nope:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.