![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Magic |
Quote:
The only problem in this story is the politicians who flatly refuse to do their job |
Quote:
http://media1.break.com/dnet/media/2...or-experts.jpg |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Honestly, I think the abortion question is settled in our country for good. I don't see our nation getting more religious. |
Steve,
The issue is that while the man has little choice, often the man is obligated based on the decision of the mother. If the mother decides to abort, it does not matter whether the father wanted the baby or not. If the mother decides not to abort, it does not matter whether the father wanted the baby or not, the father still has to pay. Women has the authority to make a decision and the man has no authority, even though the decision affects the man. While I completely support the decision being based on the mother (her body), the law needs to recognize that this decision affects more than the mother/baby. But then our laws have been biased in favour of women at the expense of men for quite a while. |
Platapus, I know all that, and I agree with you, but as I said, that is actually a different issue. It has nothing to do with the question of whether a woman should be "allowed" to have an abortion. If women are prevented to have the procedure at all, the the question of the man's involvement or rights ceases to exist. If women can have one, then and only then do all the other issues come into play.
|
I agree. :yep:
|
Quote:
As you noted here...But the question isn't one of individual cases; the question is abortion as a religious, moral and legal concept. |
Quote:
Any of the parties is anxious to make a definite statement in any direction, just because they might lose votes. [cynic]Bible belt and Ku-Klux-Clan are voters, too[/cynic] I hope common sense and the enlightenment of the last 20ieth century finds a way, but i am not optimistic. I mean don't they have a Creationism museum. Weirdoes exist the world over, but some really gather at certain areas. Greetings, Catfish P.S. Again, Irving's "The cider house rules" is still a good book about this - |
from a civil liberties stand point, why should the government be able to legislate what goes on inside one's body?
People get so worked up about gun control...don't take my guns yada yada, but we think it's okay to pass laws based upon religious standpoints that regulate what somebody's sperm, womb and ovaries ought to be doing? in my opinion, what I do with my little swimmers inside of a woman is really my business and NOT anybody else's and ESPECIALLY not uncle sams |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.