![]() |
Quote:
|
Problem is jim, we got a load of bigger dimwits who vote for them!
Apart from my mate Dave who once said on his doorstep to a canvasser who ask him is he going to vote which he answered no, I'm staying in to shag the wife. :rotfl2: |
Quote:
http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/5...ingc3b3air.jpg 500 Royal Army regulars + about 225 local reservists vs about 560 Argentine Paratroopers in the first drop (they have a Brigade but lack the planes to drop them all at once). It would be a hell of a fight. :hmmm: |
Quote:
Aided by the Rapier and Type 45 PAAMS Rapier (if they try to come in under the radar envelope) http://www.army.mod.uk/equipment/art...ence/1513.aspx Type45 PAAMS Quote:
|
Quote:
The PAAMS on the Type 45 has a range of about 60 miles meaning it can cover either the north or south side of one of the Falklands. The enemy can always land on the side its not guarding. Only four Typhoons really limits how many Argentines they can shoot down. If the enemy is smart they will force the Typhoons to attack several waves of fighters first depleting their missiles. |
If the enemy is smart, they won't attack at all. :O:
|
Quote:
Not official (view via internet numbers but front line aircraft and wholly committed pilots). If the balloon went up and a few troop carrying planes were 'downed' I should imagine the initial troop eagerness/morale would quickly dinintegrate. They weren't too keen on meeting British infantrymen up real close in 82 as I recall. Another point....those aircraft that survived the first wave would probably find their home airfields inoperable on their return so it is not beyond reasonable imagination to doubt a second wave would be forthcoming. A further point...I strongly suspect the US would be passing on plenty of satellite intel to us and perhaps even an AWAC or two on 'routine patrol'. The bottom line being...there are a lot more assetts there than a 20 man marine detachment this time. |
The original BBC article mentions just one scenario that imho indeed needs to be taken care of: that an Argentinian special command force tries to sneak in on a civilian regular flight that gets "diverted" over a claimed "emergency" that "forces" it to land at the airbase on the Falklands since it would be the only one in reach - and then trying to take it in Trojan Horse manner, in a surprise assault. No British supplies or reinforcements could come in, then. But no Argentinian forces could come in, too - since the British troops would have the means to shoot down any Argentinian transports.
So taking the airbase, would not mean Argentinian victory, but a stalemate. The question then is who could hold out for longer time. A British sub is enough to deny them naval transport as well. The whole rumbling down there is not about nationalism, but about the suspected resources in the surrounding sea areas. I currently do not see any serious attempt for a military adventure there anyway. It is rethorics to distract from innerpolitical problems. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Or maybe they lack the military tradition, equipment and training the Brits have. In other words, shivering scared.:D |
Quote:
http://static.bbc.co.uk/ahistoryofth...c_CXrw/asset/1 http://www.bbc.co.uk/ahistoryofthewo...RWKss59oc_CXrw |
Quote:
http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/3666/...cywleather.jpg |
Quote:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_-IBzbM_Roe...00/ghurka2.jpg |
God bless the Queen.
And the wonderful cutlery she bestows on her mightiest.:salute: Brits always knew about dining manners...(since the food sucks, compensation and such).. OOOOHHH. Kidding, but use more garlic, and salt... |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.