SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - Is it wrong to note 100m winners are always black?

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)

- General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)

- - Is it wrong to note 100m winners are always black? (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=187220)

You mean that Bolt, "bolted"? :ping:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 1739078)

Speaking of 100m runners, spot the disqualified one:

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/...00_468x313.jpg

Black people are natural runners just like how white people are natural beer drinkers...:D

Quote:

Originally Posted by kiwi_2005 (Post 1739122)

Black people are natural runners just like how white people are natural beer drinkers...:D

so you always run to your beer?
:rotfl2:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skybird (Post 1738392)

Careful now. Most Nobel prize winners are white. Is that a compoiment to the whole "white race"? Think of the implication - do have non-white races have intellectual deficits that derive from inferior genes?

I have niot chekced it, but I am certain that most Nobel prize winners also are males. If that is a compliment to the male gender, do females then have a stupidity-gene, or males a superior intelligence-gene?

I get your point, but just for the record, there is a 3rd possibility that I've actually heard suggested in case of females - the average is more or less the same, but there is more deviation from the average in males, so the brightest (Nobel prize winners, if the system is run right) and dumbest will both be males.