![]() |
Communist red....
|
The one man one woman marriage has a religious base, not a constitutional one. The bigger issue is marriage was made a religious/government mix containing laws and themes from both institutions that often are in conflict. This same thinking resulted in slavery and women having no rights until secular courts took the religion out of a persons free right to happiness causing no harm to others.
It's not for me, the thought of two men getting it on makes me sick, but at the same time two women could turn me on, so it's really perspective, not that I ever watch that kind of stuff....much anymore. Course these are limited state rights, so until it's a federal law nationwide, still not equal rights. People act like we're gonna see a big difference. I have a gay couple in my hood that have lived here for 20 years, if they got married I would see no difference and would never know unless told. What concerns me is the gay agenda, often pushing their themes into areas such as schools, etc. I understand the reasoning, the more that agree, the more that vote...Give them all their rights as you and I have and we should see the gay agenda die out as they will have no need for one. Polygamy will soon be the next battle. |
Quote:
|
But the gay marrying should be pink, ice caps melting should be blue and russia invades should be red
|
Yes the people have cried out and the government answered, to get a new voter base, next the insurance companies won't want to cover these same sex couples, like they do for mixed couples and their children, and again the people will cry out.
|
One more statement.
While I support them having the same rights as us, when they'll start demanding priviliges I'll stick those priviliges in their asses in a way they won't enjoy them |
A little lewd....:nope:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Its just your own little feelings that you cannot seem to explain rationaly. It doesn't make a great case for you does it? Quote:
At the end of the day marriage is in effect just a business contract between individuals. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Oh BTW your not one of them are you?:shucks: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The gays though are not sicko's. Normal and natural, made tabu by the ''holly'' men. Shouting god loves all and then denying an entire group their rights everyone else has.... that's sick. But if you start giving them priviliges, your denying rights to everyone else. And they havent earned their priviliges (as a group), cause they're ordinary people. So take that crown of your head, you proved nothing :|\\ |
No one ever said they were asking for privileges... Ever heard that old saying when you assume things you make something of you and me?
Right now they're fighting for their rights. That's awesome and I wish all Gay, Lesbian and anything else in between good luck in getting what's rightfully theirs. We'll cross the "privilege" bridge when we get there... Because to be honest, when you start accusing a group of people for fighting for privileges you're opening a whole new can of worms that encompasses more then just that group. |
Quote:
Right now they aren't. But every group has a fringe element. And once they'll achieve their goals of being equall they'll go for the priviliges. Most of them wont, that I am sure, but the loudest will. And the liberals will cry ''let's give them, they deserved it after two millenia of persecution'' and the conservatives will yell ''we should never have given them their basic rights, the end is near'' and those of us that will say ''enough, just shut up already'' will be branded as hippies, gays and faschists by all sides |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.