Sea Demon |
07-16-09 12:24 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by mookiemookie
(Post 1134966)
That is the best thing about it. Profits aren't placed above patient care. The object of a corporation is to maximize shareholder return. The only way this is done with a private health insurance company is to deny care, therefore placing the almighty dollar above someones right to live.
I say to hell with them. The best thing in the world would be if every single one of the evil and heartless bastards was run out of business.
|
This is nothing but Democrat talking point scare tactics at play. I have never been denied any kind of service, nor do I know anybody who has. The fact is, the private sector, including health care delivers a better quality product, without the beaurocratic mess that's inherent in anything run by a government agency or body. And through competition, costs usually are contained. Now if we could only control some of the top heavy governmental regulations and have some tort reform we could get somewhere.
All this program is going to do is milk the taxpaying base. And it will overburden a system that's already stretched more thin every year. You talk denial of service, I'm wondering how people including yourself will feel if health care will need to be rationed to contain and cap program cost overruns which are a guarantee.
Like I said, I want to opt out of paying for this mess. I won't use it. It's going to be big time expensive, and it's a certainty that quality of service will be crappy. Just like every other venture run by government. I will continue my private health care plan thank you very much. It will be millions like me that ensure private health care companies survive and are equipped to deliver a superior product to any government run option. You can have your crap health care mookie if that's what you want. But pay for it yourself. Your health is your responsibility..not mine.
On the same subject, here's a nice little read regarding why Obamacare will be a colossal failure:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op...-49458267.html
Here's a quote:
Quote:
This is precisely what happened in Britain. The state provides most health care, via the National Health Service. Patients have almost no say over which physician, surgeon or hospital they can use, while professionals have to conform to government plans and targets.
After its birth in 1948, planners soon found that "free" health care multiplied demand. NHS founder Lord Beveridge predicted free health care would cut spending as health improved.
The opposite was true. Between 1949 and 1979, it tripled in real terms. The service now costs twice as much as it did 10 years ago, with productivity down 4.5 percent.
One way government tries to limit demand is to decree which new drugs can be prescribed. Many drugs, widely available in America and continental Europe, are denied to British patients.
State mismanagement has also created waiting lines for hospitals, on average causing 8.6 weeks of waiting. Once inside, budgetary cutbacks on cleaning and maintenance mean higher rates of an antibiotic-resistant variety of staph infection. This "superbug" has turned even routine surgery into a lottery of death.
|
No thanks mookie.
|