UnderseaLcpl |
04-28-09 01:26 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by OneToughHerring
(Post 1092226)
Strange because here in Finland a soldier or a veteran would have top of the line in the world care and it'd be all expences paid. The same for everyone who gets sick.
|
It would be hard to compare Finland to the U.S. in that regard because there are so many differing factors. I expect that Finland's healthcare system can be administered more effectively because there are more competing political parties and there are only a few million Finns. Government gets a lot less efficient as the size of the population increases.
Just because the system works in Finland doesn't mean it will work in the U.S. Look at the state healthcare we have now. It sucks and it is very expensive.
Quote:
We take care of our veterans, and they care about defending the nation. Not just some company.
|
Our veterans also care about defending their nation, and other nations as well. U.S. citizens also try to care for our military personnel, the government just botches it sometimes, suggesting it may not be the proper agency.
Quote:
Well obviously you have neither. Your country is bankrupt and hated all over the world and the same goes for your companies.
|
I'm not going to try to make this into some sort of nationalist argument. I disapprove of my government (and its' spending) as much as you do, if not more. It has become something it was never intended to be, and I'd like to see less of it.
However, the world does not hate our companies as much as you might suppose. If people disapproved of them, they couldn't do business. No one would buy their products.
You shouldn't hate them, either. U.S businesses have never invaded a country, nor have they ever legislated foreign policy. All they do is create jobs and generate economic activity. They do a better job of such things than the state does. In fact, I think they might do a better job administering veterans' healthcare and providing military services (to some extent, obviously they cannot have a monopoly on military force, like the state does).
|