It is more than just a 'recount' it was litigation, discounting some votes, and conting other votes twice. All cases seem to somehow favor Frankin.

A few precincts had more votes than they had voters :hmm:

If it was simply just a recount there would not be as much made of the situation.

So whos 'stealing' elections now?

Really?

source?

Here is one of many, not too hard to find http://groups.google.com/group/talk....aafbec0c656b4c

I use google in this case because they are obviously unbiased /sarcasim.

Well, make it three, because Al Franken wasn't that funny as a comedian. Perhaps he'll be funnier as a politician:hmm:

That's an opinion article.

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/...heir-fact.html

Still looking for solid evidence of this.
Best so far is this - http://www.powerlineblog.com/archive.../12/022219.php

flimsy

"Its the seriousness of the charge"

:rotfl:

What's up with Minnesota and its tendency to elect unqualified nutjobs to office, anyway?