![]() |
Bernard ? :D
|
The thing the troops were apparently told was that these were two islands that the british didnt want we need to make a show they wont put up a fight how wrong they were.
last time i went to portsmouth i counted 3 carriers invincible illustrious and ark royal none of them sunk not even hermes which my farthers friend was on during the conflict as that was paid off in 1989 and sold to india. |
Quote:
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/6417/skyhawksrx5.jpg Two Skyhawks attacking HMS Broadsword, unsuccessfully thankfully. See the huge amount of SAF going out, with what looks like a 4.5" shell in the foreground. Interestingly, I've also seen the same photo used on the internet used as "evidence" in the carrier conspiracy and subtitled "Attack on the Invincible"! The "kills list" is here: http://www.histarmar.com.ar/Malvinas/ArtDiegoMarre.htm It basically counts every instance of damage to the Task Force as "serious", regardless of whether it actually was. |
After nearly 7 decades of sailing the waters, the last German U-boat, which was never accounted for, was finally sighted off the coast of South America, after having apparently undergone minor upgrades.
|
Quote:
And about the whole "not detecting it on sonar," well, a boat with it's engine(s) off dosen't make much noise... If you look closely, there is not the slightest sign of a stern wake from the boat, and it's not that uncommon for a skipper to shut down the engines when stopped for a bit. In fact, it's been done on every fishing boat I've been on. Just my opinion. |
Quote:
Look at all the silly irrationality people fall for from GW deniers, psychics, fundies, alternative medicine, homeopaths, etc. Have a run through Snopes and check out what people actually believe. A "Philosophy 101" course should be mandatory for all High School students. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Safe-Keeper,
I'm not going to get into an argument with you. Responding to the gullibility of others by adopting a default "no...no...no" position isn't intelligent, it's reflexive thinking. To be honest, I couldn't care less what people say about "viral" videos. I don't watch that sort of guff and I'm certainly not interested in whether people are taken in by them or not. Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
But I agree, this has to be Bernard, or whatever his American counterpart is called (Parker?). "Damnit, you nitwit, we nearly hit that trawler! Good thing they didn't see us! Parker, why didn't you sound the alarm?" "Why, CO, you told me to watch out for enemy warships. If that's a warship, I'm a Swedish landlubb--" "PAARKEEEEER!" |
I can tell you for a fact it's not a fishing boat - I used to work on one. It's a small Argentine naval vessel. Trawlers have nets and winches and winding gear, and the crew wear wellies. They don't have their deck space taken up with a big fluourescent RIB, and they're usually not painted naval grey.
This is a ship from the same class: http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/3...pointx3ij7.jpg Note the boom and the orange RIB on the quarterdeck. |
Bernard was at the periscope and the captain asked: its okay to surface? And Bernard looking at the fishing boat replyed to the captain: its okay captain, we can surface. :D
|
Quote:
There is nothing wrong with a healthy skepticism about stuff you see on the internet. I have heard tell that there are people on the internet who post things that are not true. :yep: |
Quote:
Probably only one or two at the most :hmm: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.