![]() |
Quote:
PD |
The only thing I'd question is their quality of training. And I don't have a clue how good/bad it is. I just don't want to find out the hard way.
Besides, China could beat us without firing a shot: Economic Embargo. |
Bingo!
Economic is their weapon right now.. A snapping of a few fingers and we are in a depression. Then again that does nothing against our military but keeps us from flexing too much. Overall I see nothing warranting budget cut bait of B-1R epicness. Want missile trucks? Call in F-15s |
Quote:
-S |
Quote:
-S |
Quote:
Granted that attacking airfields in the future is not a good idea. But it is still powerful against aircraft and against other areas. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
1 F-22 went up against 6 F-15's and the F-15's eventually gave up trying to fight, but to see just how long they could stay alive. Staying alive longer than 2 minutes was considered a feat. You should read the pilots accounts - the F-15 is done. SAAB's Gripen outclasses an F-15. Rafale outclasses an F-15. EF2000 outclasses an F-15. Mig-35 outclasses and F-15. SU-30 outclsses and F-15. Heck, even an SU-27 probably outclasses an F-15! F-15 has seen its day. F-22 will see it's day too since its first challenge will be S-37. -S |
Quote:
Funny thing is, class was held in live fire exercises against highly trained American pilots! Learn to live here, and you're on your way to becoming a great pilot! Something probably makes you learn real fast when live bullets are being shot your way! :D -S |
Quote:
I know that the F-15 is on its last legs structurally, and needs to be replaced soon before more disintegrate mid flight but: You yourself gave AIM-120D a 120nm range. Give me an AESA F-15C and big motor AMRAAM (AIM-120D) and it will kill ANY of the above without trouble (not the F-22 of course). PD |
Quote:
Side note: Could you imagin what this scattershot would do to an aircraft or a cruise missile? Kind of like a stick of butter hitting a brink wall. Or what a couple thousand 1in projectiles traveling at mach 7 would do to an platoon of APCs filled with troops? To quote Sev Trek cartoon: "He's dead Jim, someone get me a sponge!" BTW A land based weapon genneraly has a much larger supply of ammo avilable while a ship would need to rearm from an AOR. Of course if you had a rail gun for defense why not just turn it on whoever is attacking you with one or is about to. Since a land based one can be larger than one mounted on a ship the defender gets a range advantage in additon to an advantage in ammo. Against 3rd world countries rail guns will work great but against someone with equivlent technolgy its a diffrent story. New tech can cut both ways. |
Quote:
A little known fact about AESA radar though is that it has some secret capabilities, such as being able to destroy electronics from range, and it has jamming capabilities as well, so with all things being the same, and AESA on both sides, F-15 is once again the underdog. The F-15's AESA is not anywhere near par with the F-22's either. -S |
Quote:
speaking of outclassed, what about the Zero vs Wildcat? I think the superiour training/ tactics won the day for the wildcat. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
PD |
That depends if any F-15's are still airworthy in a decades time, the way things look at the moment the USAF might be looking at a short fall in its air superiority fighter force if Congress doesn't loosen up those purse strings!
I do hope the F-15 actually gets completely replaced by purely F-22's. It would be expensive... but damn! How badass would that be! OT - I wish they would model slammer D's in Falcon 4.0 AF lol, would kick arse against the AA-12s... they're nasty bits of kit! |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.