![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is Subsim, an internet board (an electronic board in the cyberspace), general topics category, and we are commenting a post. It is impossible to me to imagine how the Subsim's members can create a riot. :o:o:o:o:o Do you have any clue how this can be possible? :cool: Quote:
Ask to the Big Chief about that. :yep::yep::yep: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Guys, Neal has said not to get too heated or personal. The best way of avoiding such is by staying on the topic at hand in this thread. If you have a problem with past history between you then take it off the forums or via PM's but not here. Please? :)
|
EDIT: To prevent further misunderstanding I will abide by VON_CAPO's rule book and add that this post has: (no offense intended)
Quote:
I am not being personal here but merely acknowledging the fact that you are a hypocrite to speak of respect and freedom when you have no respect for nor tolerate freedom of religion. It is your freedom only and your respect only, it is personal and egocentric and not universal and for all. These are not attacks, they're facts unless proven wrong. If you believe me to be wrong you can instantly prove it by expressing respect for religion and speaking for freedom of religion. Do this and my post crumbles down making water. Do not do this and you prove you do not believe in universal freedom, only in freedom for some people and respect for some things. This has everything to do with the topic of persecution in university Konovalov, persecution of religious students. |
EDIT: To prevent further misunderstanding I will abide by VON_CAPO's rule book and add that this post has: (no offense intended)
Had to interrupt that post, so forgive the "double post" of sorts. Carrying on, VON_CAPO, further back you've made the following statement: Quote:
Is this it VON_CAPO? You can make statements about entire groups of people without offending them, however, I cannot make a statement about your hypocrisy without it being a personal attack? This only proves the hypocrisy even further, there is one rule for you and one for everybody else. And finally about the Chinese or Teheranian point, that's a counter-argument to precisely the statement I quoted here. If you were in China or Teheran and if you would not rebel against the authority because there would be painful consequences, then you can't speak anything of the American people if under harsher circumstances you'd just bow and obey, though you're willing to rise against authority in the USA where the Rule of Law guarantees your personal safety to do so. And if it is possible to rise against authority in the USA, that means the American people are not submissive to authority, otherwise their system would not grant you the freedom to take these guards to court had you been personally involved if you wanted to. |
Quote:
The taser doesn't work well I see unless you shoot it. They should have shot him with it so he gets the point that ID is 'mandatory' or 'leave'. -S |
Bad news, the guy is Iranian-American :-?
This is going to appear in Al Jazeera network. :-?:-?:-? ---> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3Gst...elated&search= |
A student making a few comments about this repulsive incident.
Very disturbing. ---> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gL6bW...elated&search= |
Quote:
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.