![]() |
Quote:
Should we fail with the eqp chain, the prt version will still be a valid option :up: |
This is depressing, can't skip the tutorial and can't find the line that says "hascompletedtutorial = false/true".
Argh...! Anyone had this? Can't be bothered with this tutorial, don't even know if it keeps my difficulty settings. Did it first with external view enabled and then it crashed when I saved. Then with 100% and at least it didn't ctd. Stuff like this that makes SH5 drive you mad sometimes. |
Will I have to start a new campaign with V2.3 :Kaleun_Crying:
|
Quote:
New balloons etc may cause an issue - more likely they will just not load if new id is applied to them:hmmm: I think it will be ok, but update will only take full effect with campaign progression :yep: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm far from SH5. Accidentally saw Post-vote. And happy to have made a choice. Good luck to You!:salute: P.S. TDW are no equal. He is the best and only one. He should be rewarded without a vote every year. :O: |
I Voted for you Trevally.
:rock: |
I voted for you Trevally . Any chance to include Expanded Navies by Cybermat47 v.1.0.01 in OH2.3 ?
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Typo
Hi Trevally, a small spelling mistake in Monsun Gruppe: Passage into the Rising Sun. The Mission Objective entries in the Captain's Log have 'Rendezvous' spelled incorrectly as 'Rondevu'.
PS: no hurry on the next OH2 version as I'm farther in the game than any time in the past 2 years; I don't want to restart a new campaign yet! I do look forward to the the next version though. |
Quote:
:up: :D |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:hmm2: Did you try this? Open in e.g. Note Pad http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/pict...pictureid=6846 Make sure you save it in .cfg format |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
@Sober - Yes, I will PM cybermat @Katze - thanks for the info :up: |
Balloon update
@ Trevally
sorry for the delay. I have carried several tests with IRAI .37 enabled. My conclusions below:
Summing up: perhaps changing balloon's type to one of the land Id's could be a good idea in future, but it would require the editing of its meshes (this is not a big dela anyway) and giving up the possibility of setting various heights for it. :hmmm: In any case, for the moment being I would stick to the current settings (i.e. British air roster, unit type 306) and, following your suggestion, I would place the balloon in a new campaign layer, for ease of future editing. What do you think? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.