SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   N Korea 'combat posture to hit US' (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=203301)

Oberon 04-07-13 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eddie (Post 2037981)
Well Oberon, they might be up to something else now. Like another nuclear test it seems.

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/51461969/n...-asia_pacific/

Well, that'll go down well, a potential nuclear test and missile test. Pushing that limit as far as they can go, little do they realise that it's already all been done before and failed before. The west ain't buying it any more.

Jimbuna 04-08-13 05:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 2038001)
Well, that'll go down well, a potential nuclear test and missile test. Pushing that limit as far as they can go, little do they realise that it's already all been done before and failed before. The west ain't buying it any more.

True that...and an opportunity for them to potentially embarrass themselves further in the eyes of the world.

Oberon 04-08-13 05:46 AM

Apparently, the South reckons that it's just routine movements, which makes sense, after all they usually leave it a while between detonations, presumably to make alterations to the device.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-22061377

The DPRK has evacuated their staff from Kaesong, as they said they would.

Otherwise it's business as usual on the peninsula. There can't be many more steps on the escalation ladder they can take before they have to use live rounds on someone. :hmmm:

Skybird 04-08-13 05:53 AM

LINK

A German comment with which I tend to agree and that indeed is worrying. It bases on the precedent set by the diplomatic disaster with Iran. Iran just does indeed what it always said and meant - and Western useful idiots try to reinterpret something and try to read something different into it than what it is in a bid to rearrange reality so that it turns into something available to Western diplomacy. The author raises the question what if Kim means exactly what he says? The regime in NK is seen by many experts as being close to internal collapse, the population is starving, amongst them one million soldiers who are threatened by death due to under-supply with food. If the iron curtain ever gets lifted, so the author argues, the full scale of thew horror and terror would be revealed like after the reign of the Khmer Rouge. And he elites in NK know they will be held responsible by the world. Maybe they prefer to do it like Hitler did: setting the stage for their own, self-chosen fall in a glorious final battle in which they plan to pull everybody down with them.

Jimbuna 04-08-13 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 2038093)

Otherwise it's business as usual on the peninsula. There can't be many more steps on the escalation ladder they can take before they have to use live rounds on someone. :hmmm:


Preferably this fellow below.

http://www.sabotagetimes.com/wp-cont...hairstyle.jpeg

Reece 04-08-13 08:16 AM

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/dr/hln/www/...l-health_0.jpg
A damned good spanking is what is needed!!

mapuc 04-08-13 08:36 AM

When I saw some program from NK I could almost read/see what one of the general was thinking

If i read his mind correctly then I saw this:

He/they truly believe that they will win a nuclear war with USA and SK

They believe that after a little week USA would have withdraw their troops. They expect that there will be huge demonstration in USA after the first nuke have hit US soil. And should no such things happen they expect China will come to their aid.

They know that a few bombs will be drop on them, but as they say. We and our troops are well hidden and protected, it may cost about 1½-2 million civilians

But that is very good because that would mean 1½-2 million people less to feed.

Our ground troops will first be needed, when SK have surrounded to us.

Markus

gimpy117 04-08-13 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mapuc (Post 2038181)

They know that a few bombs will be drop on them, but as they say. We and our troops are well hidden and protected, it may cost about 1½-2 million civilians

But that is very good because that would mean 1½-2 million people less to feed.

Our ground troops will first be needed, when SK have surrounded to us.

Markus

yeah, except they don't take into account for that most of the later half of the 20th century we were gearing up for full scale-firestorm-burn-entire cities-and-your-grandma nuclear war.

STEED 04-08-13 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimbuna (Post 2038125)

Problem is he needs to get laid, miserable sod he is.

gimpy117 04-08-13 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by STEED (Post 2038189)
Problem is he needs to get laid, miserable sod he is.

you think he hasn't? he probabally does the deed with anybody he wants in the North Korea whilst taking a bath in Hennessy and or wallowing in money, but always eating cake

STEED 04-08-13 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gimpy117 (Post 2038191)
you think he hasn't? he probabally does the deed with anybody he wants in the North Korea whilst taking a bath in Hennessy and or wallowing in money, but always eating cake

Lets ask him. :har:

mapuc 04-08-13 02:35 PM

A few days ago I was about to send an email to a swedish journalist
That because of what it was written in the article, he hade written

This is what I would have written(in swedish offcourse)

Dear sir

I will ask you to be more correctly regarding NK's possibility to send atomic missil against USA a.s.o

It's correct they have rocket that can reach from 6000-9000+ km
It's correct they have the possibility to make atombombs

BUT they do NOT have the knowledge to "shrink" the atomic bomb, so it fit's inside the top of an rocket and stil remain it's strenght or becoming more powerfull(warhead)

If I had, would it have been wrong??

Markus

eddie 04-08-13 02:40 PM

I don't think so mapuc, without asking questions, we will learn nothing.

Jimbuna 04-08-13 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mapuc (Post 2038343)
A few days ago I was about to send an email to a swedish journalist
That because of what it was written in the article, he hade written

This is what I would have written(in swedish offcourse)

Dear sir

I will ask you to be more correctly regarding NK's possibility to send atomic missil against USA a.s.o

It's correct they have rocket that can reach from 6000-9000+ km
It's correct they have the possibility to make atombombs

BUT they do NOT have the knowledge to "shrink" the atomic bomb, so it fit's inside the top of an rocket and stil remain it's strenght or becoming more powerfull(warhead)

If I had, would it have been wrong??

Markus


I do believe you are correct mapuc.

frau kaleun 04-08-13 06:19 PM

https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/7266947584/h35F2F219/


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.