![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
The ugly side of submarine warfare
The same here...
|
Quote:
Here's a couple of other links with info on City Of Benares: http://college.hmco.com/history/read...tyofbenare.htm http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/north..._benares.shtml |
if this isn't nasty, i dunno what is...
23 Oct 1941 An incredibly sad event befell U-106 on this date. When the replacement watch opened the tower hatch in rough seas they found out that the entire previous tower watch of 4 men had been washed overboard. [Oberleutnant zur See Werner Grüneberg, Fähnrich zur See Herbert von Bruchhausen, Oberbootsmannmaat Karl Heemann, Matrose Ewald Brühl] |
Re: The ugly side of submarine warfare
Quote:
At the moment of the attack, OS-44 comprised 46 ships in 11 columns. The four torpedoed ships were in convoy positions 64 (MARCELLA), 84 (CLAN ALPINE), 85 (OPORTO) and 92 (SEMBILANGAN), i.e. mostly in the rear positions except SEMBILANGAN, which blew up (apparently ammunition was included in her 4,657 tons of stores and general cargo). Protecting OS-44 was Escort Group 39 with three sloops (ROCHESTER, SCARBOROUGH and FLEETWOOD) and four Flower corvettes (BALSAM, COLTSFOOT, SPIREA and MIGNONETTE). Gelhaus fired a salvo of six bow torpedoes (it would be interesting to know if they were standard type or loop-running FAT) and claimed six hits. Next day he tried a second approach, but was driven off by the escort. This was one of the rare occasions in which reports from a Fw-200 'Kondor' recce aircraft allowed a successful convoy interception. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.