![]() |
Quote:
The Dick O'Kane method has been examined by submariners from World War II through the Cold War and been pronounced sound by all who have examined it. I have dozens of testimonies from SH4 players thanking me from changing their experiences from frustrated and unable to hit targets to deadeye shots who put lots of targets on the bottom. I don't accept criticism from someone who has nothing to say. You don't understand what you read and you have proved that over and over. You'll not get the opportunity to embarrass yourself again. I'll not play your silly game. Quote:
If you have even bothered to look at SH4CMS and the credits contained you wouldn't embarrass yourself by spouting foolishness. Keep it up and you'll get yourself banned like last time. |
'SH4CMS (Silent Hunter 4 Corruption Managerment System) has nothing to do with MultiSH4 except that it can make game directories for MultiSH4 by Potoroo to use"
so why not mention his name? i dont buy in to your explanation rock i dont care what you added, you took potoroo's idea, made something without giving him credit. thats plagiarism.......stealing. @CaptBones greyrider is famous for posting "evidence" which does not back his claims that wasnt a personal attack?:doh: "And the truth just doesn't seem to make much of an impression. In case you haven't got the message, your statements above are lies." yep, and the cow jumped over the moon The Dick O'Kane method has been examined by submariners from World War II through the Cold War and been pronounced sound by all who have examined it. prove it! and no where in your reply did i see you take me up on proving the constant bearing method, which is the real method used by okane, :hmmm: missed the meds this morning again rock? |
captB, your missing the point entirely, and my point in this argument is not whether
the navy used bino's with reticules, if that was the issue here, then the tread has been hijacked my argument is the method, and the scale of the method, if they did, they did, if they didnt, they didnt, i could care less really, but any gun firing at range will need to be directed. thats why in a call for fire, the call doesnt go to the guns first, it goes to the FDC first, the fire direction center and after the solution is figured at FDC, then FDC calls the guns with the information for the guns, but before FDC figures the solution, it calls the guns and gives them a warning order for a fire mission to have them alerted and standing by for the information coming. unfortunately, alot of people on here say "i cant" or "it cant". but innovative people always prove them wrong time and again. take dick okane for example, to keep pace with his targets propellers, he used a Metronome, now the "i cants" and the it cants" out there will start stomping around holding thier breath until they turn blue, saying you cant use a Metronome to keep time with a propeller, it was made to keep time in music, you cant and it cant be done. yea. or take okanes device he used in running simulated target exercises, where he used an electric razor against a mic hooked up to the hydrophones to simulate target propellers. i can hear it now, the "i cants" and the "it cants" will be hitting the roof, YOU CANT USE AN ELECTRIC RAZOR TO SIMULATE A TARGETS PROPELLERS, IT WAS MADE FOR SHAVING, AND ITS ONLY PURPOSE IS FOR SHAVING AND THATS IT. yea. but! people like okane prove the i cants and it cants wrong every time. you dont say i cant or it cant to people of ingenuity, you could never say that to someone like patton without getting a dressing down badly, and then you get the proof that says it can. my whole point in this is innovation and adaptation, and thats all, as commander, i would use anything and everything that would help me do my job better, destroy the enemy, and save my troops lives and my own life to, as best as a could accomplish that, and nothing more. |
Quote:
If you think I've made personal attacks you know where to take your case. Make it good. Remember statements of fact are not attacks. If you think I've plagiarized, then you can get me kicked off Subsim permanently. Make your best case. If you think I've used materials without proper attribution then I can be permanently kicked off Subsim. I wish you well. But all you are doing here is making yourself look like a fool. You are doing a very good job of that, I must say. That's all I have to say to you. You are on ignore, ranting to yourself. |
This thread needs a time out. Gentlemen, please.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.