![]() |
Quote:
this post i put the pictures up of the arse end of alrosa http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=229270 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
@Speed150mph The thin ring on the 688i might not be effective at high speeds just as you mentioned. The Russian Typhoon SSBN has very long rings (shrouds) which is to say that they are to prevent cavitation by the propellers' blade tips to higher speeds than on the 688i, probably even to its maximum speed...But the tips of those blades are 'sloppy'. Perhaps because they have those long rings/shrouds and they thought to give the blades maximum push efficiency. The thing with propellers is that they don't push with equal/uniform force distribution....I guess that's why everyone is building submarines with pump-jet propulsions to have a more uniform force distribution to minimize cavitation...allowing for higher tactical speed. A more uniform force distribution demands a new innovative way to propel submarines without the use of any propellers or to use much thinner and more numerous blades perhaps not unlike blades in jet engines... Perhaps, although this is just speculation, a new innovative way to propel submarines can be found by mimicking nature. There's a reason propeller- like propulsion isn't found in nature. It could be because it's not the best way to move around underwater... Edit: I googled octopus inspired submarines and found a good link. http://www.ibtimes.com.au/octopus-in...e-ever-1419803 https://battlemachines.files.wordpre...on-tk-2081.jpg |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.