![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Abortion should be legal from birth until 17 years old. You get some teenager snotting off to you? Abort and start over. I think you would have a generation of very polite teenagers. :yep:
|
Quote:
Does that mean I have to jerk him off too? With respects to the late Rodney Dangerfield. :salute: |
Quote:
This sounds outdated, until 25 years old might be more appropriate now. :D |
Eesh! :o
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Agreed! If men are against abortion then they should consider castration or at least get fixed... |
within acceptable tolerances, absolutely the choice of the woman in question. Not some old ultra-conservative in washington, not the church, the woman's choice.
The only issue i see relavent is WHEN you should still be able to abort. 15-20 weeks is when the baby develops brain function, neural pathways, multiple internal organs, ect. Where's the cutoff point? What time is a fetus considered a human being? I don't know. i'd say that by week 20 the fetus is pretty developed and shows signs of human behavior. It's also month 5, which takes some SERIOUS obliviousness to ignore the signs, though technically by week 12 you should've noticed that you aren't having any periods and possibly signs of pregnancy. |
If you where meant to be here you will be if you where not you wont be that is the way I look at.
If god or what ever the creator is in a persons mind is so powerful then he/it/they if they had some being of importance they would make that person exist. Some people say put the kid up for adoption and many people are adopted but not all have a better life this way some adoptive parents are horrible and have even killed the children they adopt or neglected them. Signs of pregnancy vary from woman to woman and women have been pregnant and not known it until birth and not because they where half wits either. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Magic |
Quote:
The only problem in this story is the politicians who flatly refuse to do their job |
Quote:
http://media1.break.com/dnet/media/2...or-experts.jpg |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Honestly, I think the abortion question is settled in our country for good. I don't see our nation getting more religious. |
Steve,
The issue is that while the man has little choice, often the man is obligated based on the decision of the mother. If the mother decides to abort, it does not matter whether the father wanted the baby or not. If the mother decides not to abort, it does not matter whether the father wanted the baby or not, the father still has to pay. Women has the authority to make a decision and the man has no authority, even though the decision affects the man. While I completely support the decision being based on the mother (her body), the law needs to recognize that this decision affects more than the mother/baby. But then our laws have been biased in favour of women at the expense of men for quite a while. |
Platapus, I know all that, and I agree with you, but as I said, that is actually a different issue. It has nothing to do with the question of whether a woman should be "allowed" to have an abortion. If women are prevented to have the procedure at all, the the question of the man's involvement or rights ceases to exist. If women can have one, then and only then do all the other issues come into play.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.