SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Obama's impeachable Offenses(link) (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=192261)

Oberon 02-08-12 07:10 PM

I think the most serious question to ask here is...

Why are people taking this thread seriously?

Stop it. :O:

CCIP 02-08-12 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vienna (Post 1835627)
Anyone else remember the sight of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, William Rehnquist, strutting about pompously in a robe he said was copied from a design in a Gilbert & Sullivan operetta, through the halls of the House and presiding over a farce engineered by NeoCon GOP members in an attempt to impeach and remove a sitting President over charges not even an -Nth of a degree as "serious" as those given by the law professor? Because of that little fiasco, the question of legal precedence is a ship that has already sailed...

Good point! It was, in fairness, a failed impeachment, but it did set some very dangerous possibilities open for the future. That said, I wouldn't take the threat very seriously right now. I don't think those same neocon GOP members are in a position to benefit from this kind of scenario at the moment anyway. If they can't take Obama down in the elections, they would probably only polarize and offend voters more by maneuvers like this.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 1835641)
I think the most serious question to ask here is...

Why are people taking this thread seriously?

Stop it. :O:

We're nerds and can't help it :O:

Buddahaid 02-08-12 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CCIP (Post 1835668)
Good point! It was, in fairness, a failed impeachment, but it did set some very dangerous possibilities open for the future. That said, I wouldn't take the threat very seriously right now. I don't think those same neocon GOP members are in a position to benefit from this kind of scenario at the moment anyway. If they can't take Obama down in the elections, they would probably only polarize and offend voters more by maneuvers like this.




We're nerds and can't help it :O:

That implies logic that often defies a mob mentality which would seem to be an apt description these days. It's not beyond the possible simply by inertia.

Torplexed 02-08-12 09:47 PM

No matter what year or political season it is, impeachment talk is always dirt cheap. :zzz:

yubba 02-08-12 10:20 PM

When it all goes to hell in a hand basket what will it matter, we'll be too busy in our backyards looking for worms to eat.

nikimcbee 02-08-12 10:56 PM

http://cdn.head-fi.org/d/d1/d111892f...homer_2141.gif

Quote:

looking for worms to eat.

HHHHM, free protein

soopaman2 02-09-12 12:15 PM

I love how Obama is generalized as a communist or socialist. When him and nearly all politician are more fascist in policies than anything. Socialist really? You guys love bailing out banks, but hate Cost of Living raises for the elderly. How is it socialism when you pay into it your entire life, then it is used to fund a war. That sounds more like thievery to me. Blame the poor for our governments excesses. Yeah spoken like a true fascist.

Or is the OP just so blindly partisan he can't see the evils of our system as a whole?

I feel sorry for you, and mean that in a heartfelt way. It makes perfect sense why we have the government we do right now.

Joseph McCarthy (R) called, he wants his lingo, and 60 year old cold war fear mongering back.

misha1967 02-09-12 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen (Post 1834997)
No doubt. When I hear a student throw an epithet in my direction, I think that this must be a student that is coming to class with an open mind and hearing what I have to say; a student that is seeking to better himself by considering all points of view before formulating an opinion.

There is a lot of truth in that snark, Takeda.

On the other hand, I have to say that as I have grown older and wiser in the ways of the world, I have learned that there are subjects where a dismissive attitude is the correct one. At least the ones that you've heard and debunked so many times before that having to repeat it has become tedious beyond belief.

I still listen, though. Then, if it turns out the argument belongs in the "the Moon landings were faked!" category, I just shake my had, chuckle and move along.

Hottentot 02-09-12 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soopaman2 (Post 1835989)
I love how Obama is generalized as a communist or socialist. When him and nearly all politician are more fascist in policies than anything. Socialist really? You guys love bailing out banks, but hate Cost of Living raises for the elderly. How is it socialism when you pay into it your entire life, then it is used to fund a war. That sounds more like thievery to me. Blame the poor for our governments excesses. Yeah spoken like a true fascist.

Because.

soopaman2 02-09-12 12:45 PM

You enjoy your worms.

I'll be drinking my victory brand gin, and smoking crap cigs where most the tobacco falls out.

Better than what the proles get at least. Oh it is time for the 3 minute hate, where we curse Emmanuel Goldstien (Osama, Iran, Syria) and praise the patriot act.

I wonder what the backlash would be if the Patriot act was founded under Obama....

Hmmm?

If you miss our current direction towards something Orwell wrote, then you are blind.

And yes, the blame is truly partyless, it is our fault, for choosing a political sportsteam mentality for our nation.

misha1967 02-09-12 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soopaman2 (Post 1836005)
I wonder what the backlash would be if the Patriot act was founded under Obama....

Hmmm?

Come to think of it: Wasn't that horrible violation of privacy rights, the Patriot Act, renewed three times by Obama?

And how come that drone strikes etc. are suddenly a-OK now that it's not an evil Republican doing them?

What's the word I'm looking for? Begins with an "H"... Hmm... Still working on it. Rhymes with "leprosy"...

Ah yes, I've got it: Hypocrisy!

soopaman2 02-09-12 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by misha1967 (Post 1836036)
Come to think of it: Wasn't that horrible violation of privacy rights, the Patriot Act, renewed three times by Obama?

And how come that drone strikes etc. are suddenly a-OK now that it's not an evil Republican doing them?

What's the word I'm looking for? Begins with an "H"... Hmm... Still working on it. Rhymes with "leprosy"...

Ah yes, I've got it: Hypocrisy!

Your point? Maybe if a repub strong congress didn't fillibuster anything that would help the people in order to make the nigg, I uhh mean Barry Soetoro, Err Obama into a one term president, as admitted, we would be in a better place today.

But because partisan politics, and pledges to Grover Norquist are more important than the people, and what is best to the country, I suppose us normal folks have to take the abuse.

You ask as if I like my current president. He is simply better than the other options.


I'm still waiting for the "for the people, by the people part"

So you think me contradictory, because I like the black kenyan in office.

Better than the options sir.

Hypocrite? (does not rhyme with leprosy, kinda a stretch) No, I simply want our rights back, that we bent over and gave them out of fear after 9-11.

Crap like this, the extensions as you mentioned is what makes me believe we are similar to fascist Italy at this point.

But conservatives like the status quo, see my sig on my opinions of how well the status quo works.

Feed the corps, starves the proles. The true southern conservative way.

To think we once freed the slaves, now our government works to make all of slaves to it super PAC benfactors, thanks citizens United decision, a conservative supreme court ruling...

And you wonder why people are forced to democrats?

Give us a viable non partisan choice. No anti tax pledges to Grover Norquist. No backroom dealings with George Soros. For the freaking people, by the people.

or else....
Quote:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. ***8212; That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, ***8212; That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. ***8212; Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
It is our right to change it, regardless of anti protesting laws they may pass. These rights were given to us by our founders, who saw us as free men, not corporate puppets.

So tell us why you hate Obama? I already blew any socialist arguments out the water, it is well established he is as fascist as any (R)...

Sooooo.

AVGWarhawk 02-09-12 01:52 PM

Quote:

You ask as if I like my current president. He is simply better than the other options.
No sir..he is about the same as the other options.

soopaman2 02-09-12 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk (Post 1836054)
No sir..he is about the same as the other options.


I have no counterpoint to offer, nor will I.

As leftist as I come across, I have voted republican more times in my adult life.

My defense of the spinless one is not partisanship, but a fear of the far right winger choices.

Mc Cain was so moderate, why did Palin have to mess it up for him? Why? Why? Why?

I was a McCain (warhero centrist republican) shoe in until Palin came around. She makes Joe Biden look like FDR.

vienna 02-09-12 02:25 PM

Quote:

And how come that drone strikes etc. are suddenly a-OK now that it's not an evil Republican doing them?
Possibly because the strikes done now seem to obliterate higher value targets (Al Queda leadership. Taliban leaders, etc) than when the previous administration launched their strikes; to paraphrase Voltaire, "Sucess is the best deodorant"...

vienna 02-09-12 02:38 PM

Quote:

Mc Cain was so moderate, why did Palin have to mess it up for him? Why? Why? Why?

I was a McCain (warhero centrist republican) shoe in until Palin came around. She makes Joe Biden look like FDR.
Amen to that!...

I have a rather cynical acquaintance who has this theory: the GOP leadership knew just how badly the Bush administration had screwed up the economy and they knew the worst was yet to come as a result of those failures after Bush left office; not wanting a GOP member in the White House when the Bandini hit the fan, they put a "poison pill" in the 2008 campaign in the form of Palin. Therefore, a Dem presides over the maelstrom of economic failure, the GOP gets a "free kick" in the form of having a Dem to kick around with minimal blame on themselves, and then the GOP can take back the White House just as they economy begins to come around, taking credit for the "rescue of" the economy...

I don't think this was a GOP master plan, because I don't think the GOP leadership is that smart (as evidenced by the "sterling" candidates they are fielding, so far), but, I must admit, if the idea didn't sound like something out of a political novel, it would rate some consideration... :hmmm:

soopaman2 02-09-12 02:43 PM

I like the drone strikes.

It don't cost me a plane ticket to DC to attend family members funerals.

Ceremonies at Arlington are beautiful, but twice as sad for some reason...

Maybe because you know they died for rich people, and Cheneys little mercenary company.

But I am just a pinko commie pig right?

soopaman2 02-09-12 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vienna (Post 1836082)
Amen to that!...

I have a rather cynical acquaintance who has this theory: the GOP leadership knew just how badly the Bush administration had screwed up the economy and they new the worst was yet to come as a result of those failures after Bush left office; not wanting a GOP member in the White House when the Bandini hit the fan, they put a "poison pill" in the 2008 campaign in the form of Palin. Therefore, a Dem presides over the maelstrom of economic failure, the GOP gets a "free kick" in the form of having a Dem to kick around with minimal blame on themselves, and then the GOP can take back the White House just as they economy begins to come around, taking credit for the "rescue of" the economy...

I don't think this was a GOP master plan, because I don't think the GOP leadership is that smart (as evidenced by the "sterling" candidates they are fielding, so far), but, I must admit, if the idea didn't sound like something out of a political novel, it would rate some consideration... :hmmm:


Pardon my back to back posts, but I type slow and caught this late.

But YES!

They were simply setting themselves up for 2012, and were willing to drive the country into the toilet to meet those goals.

Obama is going to win by default. Not because he is good, but because is is less harmful to the majority than the other options. Good job Repubs, no one else to blame but your extremism.

The man who says little, has more credibility than the man who says too much....Add that to the damn proverb thread, Soopaman2 said it, quote me..

Bubblehead1980 02-09-12 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve (Post 1835168)
How did you even graduate high school?


Typos happen:salute:

Bubblehead1980 02-09-12 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mookiemookie (Post 1835139)
Love him or hate him, Tribesman did bring up a good point when he pointed out that Bubs like to throw around the "I'm in law school" line like it gives his statements more weight, but then he turns around and talks about how the professors are pinko commies who run leftist socialist indoctrination courses. You can't have it both ways.

A well known fact is that academia is dominated by lefties.I have a few professors who are fair but most are far left and make it pretty well known.I mentioned( just a few times) that I am in law school because it is a pertinent fact when discussing certain things namely law etc , not because I am attempting to give my statements more "weight" as you put it.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.