Fair enough. I missed that part, and I don't mind admitting when I'm wrong.

On the other hand, there is no need for this kind of rudeness:

Attack ? :haha: Are you on nervous exhaustion ? Nonsence is nonsence, that's all.

So just to let you know.
Even if I tried, I couldn't care less how you take it :shucks:

I made a mistake. I admitted it. Exactly how is a mistake nonsense? You started in on me in your first post, being rude rather than polite. Your dismissive use of the phrase "if you ever read the document yourself mister" is a prime example of the way you do these things. How I take it is irrelevant. It was this kind of behaviour that got you brigged last time.

Please act like a gentleman with respect to other members on this board.

See Steve?
rudeness is very annoying thing when happening ,no matter who has the right or not.

I'm well aware of that, and, as I told you privately, I try to stay on top of it.

On that subject, the person you were upset about has buried the hatchet and is playing nicely now. He also admitted that much of it was his fault, so things are better on that frontier.

:Kaleun_Salute:

You admitted it because you had no other option. Frankly speaking I think you didin't even read it all aren't you ? =]

But no you just can't backdown peacefully even when you are wrong, without escalating things to outside matters! :-?


Those following gripes of yours I take as insignifical attempt to draw attention to yourself as being a poor victim of my rudiness or impoliteness ? :haha: Just because I put your statement into nonsense ?
Oh man, can all of this stuff you take everywhere with you be more childish ? Knowing your age, your acting makes fun of you realy :)

Hi,

IIRC, the pistol could not be changed when the torpedo was inside the tube. In this respect SH3 is wrong.

BTW, PapaKilo, some time ago I posted a link to the document in h.sie's thread and asked you to read it

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/show...postcount=2567

Maybe you should have read it back then before attacking h.sie's work.

Cheers, LGN1

IIRC the argue was about how many duds in total % Kriegsmarine had, and how should this number be divided to every uboat. You and H.sie stated it was around 30 % of all torps that malfunctioned, I stated it was 50 % according to documentary source I gave a name of. Nevertheless I never was into such close readings about torpedo malfunctions as I am now.

IIRC you gave me the link to german languaged document that I don't understand ?

Can we steer away from the realm of insults toward community members please?

I'm in no way taking sides but let us agree to disagree without resorting to name calling and innuendo.

TIA

I made a quick search in google on how Schalterstellung A worked in practice, but with no decent results so far :(

That's true to a point. I was wrong. That's simple enough.

No, you were on the attack from the beginning. It's what you do that gets you into trouble. The two are not connected.


I'm not a victim at all. Rather than discuss thing honestly you kick people every chance you get. I'm glad to make fun of myself. You, on the other hand, only make fun of others, and you do it in the meanest manner possible. I admit that I'm wrong, and laugh at myself most of the time. This seems to be something you're not capable of.

Don't say that you don't take sides quoting my post :nope:

As I get to know you with time, I think it's the most you do all the time, becoming wrong and having fun :)

But if somebody shows how you your look in the mirror you get really pissed :haha:

This is because there is a missmatch in what you say and how you feel =]

Am I that way now? How do you know what I feel? On the other hand do you ever admit to being wrong about anything? No, I'm not upset about being wrong, or about being corrected. On the other hand I don't spend my entire time here making fun of people and trying to get them angry. It seems to be all you know how to do. It's why you have a reputation for being a troll, and why you've been banned before, and brigged so many times.

I quoted your post as an example of the last exchange and said post had examples of innuendo and statements of potential conflict based within.

Can we not all get along together...minus the angst?

Don't know, you should ask Steve first. He's our touchy soul here =]

Well let us all just try to get along.

No problem with debating differing opinions but name calling and personal attacks (should they occur) are in direct violation of the community rules.

Let us all simply get along together.

:haha: I tell how this works. If there was anyone else but me that corrected you it would be fine. But you own this kind of complex that it was me - A BAAAD TROLL that made you blush.. So you acknowledged that you was wrong but, occused me about how I did it as a worst case to embitter the whole matter. And you do this all the time BTW :) I think you are a TROLL who never wanted to be a TROLL.
Main difference between us is that I'm a TROLL and I never give a damn about it :) Why ? Because there will always be someone who will do it for you :haha:

Sounds nice, I think I can do that now :)