SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   Silent Hunter III (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=182)
-   -   Torpedo Options (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=190368)

Sailor Steve 12-13-11 12:48 PM

Fair enough. I missed that part, and I don't mind admitting when I'm wrong.

On the other hand, there is no need for this kind of rudeness:
Quote:

Originally Posted by PapaKilo (Post 1804517)
I must notice Sailor Steve spoke a nonsence on this topic :) If you ever read the document yourself Mister, you should know that in page 51 there is following text:


PapaKilo 12-13-11 12:53 PM

Attack ? :haha: Are you on nervous exhaustion ? Nonsence is nonsence, that's all.

So just to let you know.
Even if I tried, I couldn't care less how you take it :shucks:

Sailor Steve 12-13-11 01:20 PM

I made a mistake. I admitted it. Exactly how is a mistake nonsense? You started in on me in your first post, being rude rather than polite. Your dismissive use of the phrase "if you ever read the document yourself mister" is a prime example of the way you do these things. How I take it is irrelevant. It was this kind of behaviour that got you brigged last time.

Please act like a gentleman with respect to other members on this board.

makman94 12-13-11 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve (Post 1804668)
.....with respect to other members on this board.

See Steve?
rudeness is very annoying thing when happening ,no matter who has the right or not.

Sailor Steve 12-13-11 01:53 PM

I'm well aware of that, and, as I told you privately, I try to stay on top of it.

On that subject, the person you were upset about has buried the hatchet and is playing nicely now. He also admitted that much of it was his fault, so things are better on that frontier.

makman94 12-13-11 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve (Post 1804695)
....I try to stay on top of it.

:Kaleun_Salute:

PapaKilo 12-13-11 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve (Post 1804668)
I made a mistake. I admitted it. Exactly how is a mistake nonsense? You started in on me in your first post, being rude rather than polite. Your dismissive use of the phrase "if you ever read the document yourself mister" is a prime example of the way you do these things. How I take it is irrelevant. It was this kind of behaviour that got you brigged last time.

Please act like a gentleman with respect to other members on this board.

You admitted it because you had no other option. Frankly speaking I think you didin't even read it all aren't you ? =]

But no you just can't backdown peacefully even when you are wrong, without escalating things to outside matters! :-?


Those following gripes of yours I take as insignifical attempt to draw attention to yourself as being a poor victim of my rudiness or impoliteness ? :haha: Just because I put your statement into nonsense ?
Oh man, can all of this stuff you take everywhere with you be more childish ? Knowing your age, your acting makes fun of you realy :)

LGN1 12-13-11 03:04 PM

Hi,

IIRC, the pistol could not be changed when the torpedo was inside the tube. In this respect SH3 is wrong.

BTW, PapaKilo, some time ago I posted a link to the document in h.sie's thread and asked you to read it

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/show...postcount=2567

Maybe you should have read it back then before attacking h.sie's work.

Cheers, LGN1

PapaKilo 12-13-11 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LGN1 (Post 1804729)
Hi,

IIRC, the pistol could not be changed when the torpedo was inside the tube. In this respect SH3 is wrong.

BTW, PapaKilo, some time ago I posted a link to the document in h.sie's thread and asked you to read it

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/show...postcount=2567

Maybe you should have read it back then before attacking h.sie's work.

Cheers, LGN1

IIRC the argue was about how many duds in total % Kriegsmarine had, and how should this number be divided to every uboat. You and H.sie stated it was around 30 % of all torps that malfunctioned, I stated it was 50 % according to documentary source I gave a name of. Nevertheless I never was into such close readings about torpedo malfunctions as I am now.

IIRC you gave me the link to german languaged document that I don't understand ?

Jimbuna 12-13-11 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PapaKilo (Post 1804724)
You admitted it because you had no other option. Frankly speaking I think you didin't even read it all aren't you ? =]

But no you just can't backdown peacefully even when you are wrong, without escalating things to outside matters! :-?


Those following gripes of yours I take as insignifical attempt to draw attention to yourself as being a poor victim of my rudiness or impoliteness ? :haha: Just because I put your statement into nonsense ?
Oh man, can all of this stuff you take everywhere with you be more childish ? Knowing your age, your acting makes fun of you realy :)

Can we steer away from the realm of insults toward community members please?

I'm in no way taking sides but let us agree to disagree without resorting to name calling and innuendo.

TIA

PapaKilo 12-13-11 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LGN1 (Post 1804729)
Hi,

IIRC, the pistol could not be changed when the torpedo was inside the tube. In this respect SH3 is wrong.


I made a quick search in google on how Schalterstellung A worked in practice, but with no decent results so far :(

Sailor Steve 12-13-11 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PapaKilo (Post 1804724)
You admitted it because you had no other option. Frankly speaking I think you didin't even read it all aren't you ? =]

That's true to a point. I was wrong. That's simple enough.

Quote:

But no you just can't backdown peacefully even when you are wrong, without escalating things to outside matters! :-?
No, you were on the attack from the beginning. It's what you do that gets you into trouble. The two are not connected.


Quote:

Those following gripes of yours I take as insignifical attempt to draw attention to yourself as being a poor victim of my rudiness or impoliteness ? :haha: Just because I put your statement into nonsense ?
Oh man, can all of this stuff you take everywhere with you be more childish ? Knowing your age, your acting makes fun of you realy :)
I'm not a victim at all. Rather than discuss thing honestly you kick people every chance you get. I'm glad to make fun of myself. You, on the other hand, only make fun of others, and you do it in the meanest manner possible. I admit that I'm wrong, and laugh at myself most of the time. This seems to be something you're not capable of.

PapaKilo 12-13-11 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna (Post 1804758)
Can we steer away from the realm of insults toward community members please?

I'm in no way taking sides but let us agree to disagree without resorting to name calling and innuendo.

TIA

Don't say that you don't take sides quoting my post :nope:

PapaKilo 12-13-11 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve (Post 1804764)
I admit that I'm wrong, and laugh at myself most of the time. This seems to be something you're not capable of.

As I get to know you with time, I think it's the most you do all the time, becoming wrong and having fun :)

But if somebody shows how you your look in the mirror you get really pissed :haha:

This is because there is a missmatch in what you say and how you feel =]

Sailor Steve 12-13-11 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PapaKilo (Post 1804773)
As I get to know you with time, I think it's the most you do all the time, becoming wrong and having fun :)

But if somebody shows how you your look in the mirror you get really pissed :haha:

This is because there is a missmatch in what you say and how you feel =]

Am I that way now? How do you know what I feel? On the other hand do you ever admit to being wrong about anything? No, I'm not upset about being wrong, or about being corrected. On the other hand I don't spend my entire time here making fun of people and trying to get them angry. It seems to be all you know how to do. It's why you have a reputation for being a troll, and why you've been banned before, and brigged so many times.

Jimbuna 12-13-11 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PapaKilo (Post 1804767)
Don't say that you don't take sides quoting my post :nope:

I quoted your post as an example of the last exchange and said post had examples of innuendo and statements of potential conflict based within.

Can we not all get along together...minus the angst?

PapaKilo 12-13-11 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna (Post 1804778)
I quoted your post as an example of the last exchange and said post had examples of innuendo and statements of potential conflict based within.

Can we not all get along together...minus the angst?

Don't know, you should ask Steve first. He's our touchy soul here =]

Jimbuna 12-13-11 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PapaKilo (Post 1804779)
Don't know, you should ask Steve first. He's our touchy soul here =]

Well let us all just try to get along.

No problem with debating differing opinions but name calling and personal attacks (should they occur) are in direct violation of the community rules.

Let us all simply get along together.

PapaKilo 12-13-11 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve (Post 1804777)
Am I that way now? How do you know what I feel? On the other hand do you ever admit to being wrong about anything? No, I'm not upset about being wrong, or about being corrected. On the other hand I don't spend my entire time here making fun of people and trying to get them angry. It seems to be all you know how to do. It's why you have a reputation for being a troll, and why you've been banned before, and brigged so many times.

:haha: I tell how this works. If there was anyone else but me that corrected you it would be fine. But you own this kind of complex that it was me - A BAAAD TROLL that made you blush.. So you acknowledged that you was wrong but, occused me about how I did it as a worst case to embitter the whole matter. And you do this all the time BTW :) I think you are a TROLL who never wanted to be a TROLL.
Main difference between us is that I'm a TROLL and I never give a damn about it :) Why ? Because there will always be someone who will do it for you :haha:

PapaKilo 12-13-11 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna (Post 1804785)
Well let us all just try to get along.

No problem with debating differing opinions but name calling and personal attacks (should they occur) are in direct violation of the community rules.

Let us all simply get along together.

Sounds nice, I think I can do that now :)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.