SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   Silent Hunter III (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=182)
-   -   Capital ships in convoys??? (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=173448)

CherryHarbey 08-20-10 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pisces (Post 1472109)
Oh great, I just finished my patrol on April 1st 1940. There goes my R&R. Talk about April Fools'. :damn:

Yep, you're going to be back out pretty sharpish if you using SH3 Commander.
I finished my last patrol 6th April 1940, was back out 12th April and that included a day to repair 1% hull damage and a couple of days to upgrade the batteries.

Jimbuna 08-20-10 05:31 AM

It was often the case that a BB and close escort would shadow a convoy from a distance during the day but during the night they would on occasion rejoin the convoy because it was felt the BB would be less vulnerable to torpedo attack during the hours of darkness when surrounded by merchantmens hulls......the accompanying escort would then bolster up the convoy escort.

The usually heavy AA weaponry was also useful to help in cases of attack from the air.

HW3 08-20-10 06:23 AM

I have a video of Jurgen Oesten telling about attacking a convoy from Freetown, accompanied by the old Battleship Malaya, in U-106 with U-105. He states that the Malaya was inside the convoy during the day, using its plane to hunt for u-boats, and left at night for the first 5 days they attacked. Once they had sunk a number of ships, the Malaya didn't leave the convoy one night. Jurgen said he was unaware it hadn't left the convoy when he attacked with the last of his torpedoes, and put one into the Malaya, damaging it, and causing it to travel to New York for repairs.

:salute:

Alpha Von Burg 08-20-10 09:05 AM

Just hours ago, I was patroling the north atlantic when I came about a convoy with a capitan ship in the middle, HMS Nelson. Luckly for me, this convoy only had that one battleship and 1 destroyer.

Got rid of the destroyer and targeted the BB. I had to use magnetic because I was shooting at an angle, this would also probably explain why it took me 4-6 torps to sink it.

Really lucky if you ask me to have found a convoy with a capitan ship in the middle and only 1 destroyer escort.

Jimbuna 08-20-10 03:05 PM

Extremely lucky http://www.psionguild.org/forums/ima...ies/pirate.gif

iambecomelife 08-20-10 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna (Post 1472427)
It was often the case that a BB and close escort would shadow a convoy from a distance during the day but during the night they would on occasion rejoin the convoy because it was felt the BB would be less vulnerable to torpedo attack during the hours of darkness when surrounded by merchantmens hulls......the accompanying escort would then bolster up the convoy escort.

The usually heavy AA weaponry was also useful to help in cases of attack from the air.

Correct. After the loss of "HMS Edinburgh" and "HMS Trinidad", when heavy units escorted the convoy it was common practice for them to sail at a high speed to avoid the enemy - maybe 16-18 knots - and make "S" turns so that they didn't take themselves too far from the convoy. This reveals a weakness of the SH3 campaign engine - it does not allow for complex escort behaviors, variable speeds, or breakup/merging of individual units in a convoy.

maillemaker 08-20-10 04:00 PM

Quote:

Correct. After the loss of "HMS Edinburgh" and "HMS Trinidad", when heavy units escorted the convoy it was common practice for them to sail at a high speed to avoid the enemy - maybe 16-18 knots - and make "S" turns so that they didn't take themselves too far from the convoy. This reveals a weakness of the SH3 campaign engine - it does not allow for complex escort behaviors, variable speeds, or breakup/merging of individual units in a convoy.
I agree. The AI of the ships is rather primitive. I should never be able to surface in an unarmed convoy and deck-gun ship after ship after ship. They should either scatter or try to ram me.

The other thing that I wish had been better attended to is the modeling of the physical interaction of the u-boat with the water. I would like to see water sluicing around railing stanchions, or even just the conning tower.

Steve

iambecomelife 08-20-10 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maillemaker (Post 1472923)
I agree. The AI of the ships is rather primitive. I should never be able to surface in an unarmed convoy and deck-gun ship after ship after ship. They should either scatter or try to ram me.

The other thing that I wish had been better attended to is the modeling of the physical interaction of the u-boat with the water. I would like to see water sluicing around railing stanchions, or even just the conning tower.

Steve

I'll never forget playing "Sub Battle" by EPYX (one of my first two computer games) back in 1992 and having a convoy scatter after I sank both of its escorts. VERY impressive AI for an old, single floppy disk game. There's no reason why this can't be implemented in a modern simulator.

K-61 08-22-10 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iambecomelife (Post 1472972)
I'll never forget playing "Sub Battle" by EPYX (one of my first two computer games) back in 1992 and having a convoy scatter after I sank both of its escorts. VERY impressive AI for an old, single floppy disk game. There's no reason why this can't be implemented in a modern simulator.

Agreed. It is too bad that the programmers of SH3 couldn't model more complex behaviour. In my opinion, they were pressured by executive types to hurry up and get it out the door and thus could not model everything they would have liked. There's no way the admiralty would place a battleship inside a convoy and only have one ASW escort. One reason why the U-boats had a happy time was that many of the vessels capable of ASW work were dedicated to battleships and carriers or protecting home waters against a Sealion landing operation. Because of game limitations, I will no longer attack capital ships sailing inside the convoy perimeter, notwithstanding Jurgen Osten's account, which was exceptional. I will have no qualms about attacking BB's or CV's sailing in their own task forces at high speeds and have had success at nailing both types in such a manner.

Gerald 08-22-10 05:49 PM

My convoys consisting of approx. 90% TF,
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by K-61 (Post 1474611)
Agreed. It is too bad that the programmers of SH3 couldn't model more complex behaviour. In my opinion, they were pressured by executive types to hurry up and get it out the door and thus could not model everything they would have liked. There's no way the admiralty would place a battleship inside a convoy and only have one ASW escort. One reason why the U-boats had a happy time was that many of the vessels capable of ASW work were dedicated to battleships and carriers or protecting home waters against a Sealion landing operation. Because of game limitations, I will no longer attack capital ships sailing inside the convoy perimeter, notwithstanding Jurgen Osten's account, which was exceptional. I will have no qualms about attacking BB's or CV's sailing in their own task forces at high speeds and have had success at nailing both types in such a manner.

and it is OK to hunt like that "also, only one is tightened,
http://imgur.com/TYsew.jpg

Zedwardson 08-22-10 06:32 PM

Yes, they are occasionally there to deal with surface raiders, I encountered one, but the escorts had a line on me so we had to spend a lot of time 100 meters and rolling with the charges, and had to haul it out of that place.


I have sunk two Capital ships, one was theH.M.S. Ramillies, which I got with a sniper shot at 10,000 meters as i was in the right place at the right time as I was run over by a task force at night in a storm. (I had lucked out and had a four shot type I loaded up.). And last night I sunk the hood after sneaking into port, but didn't make it out.

Now the hood has gotten away a half dozen times from my captains, so it was very therapeutic to get a clean four shot spread with four hits.



Gerald 08-22-10 06:46 PM

A good one
 
HMS Ramillies

http://imgur.com/S3TG4.jpg


:yep:

Jimbuna 08-22-10 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendor (Post 1474672)
HMS Ramillies

http://imgur.com/S3TG4.jpg


:yep:

Bless her memory :salute:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Ramillies_(07)

Zedwardson 08-22-10 10:07 PM

In real life she was a tough old bird who fought two world wars. :salute:

brendan 08-22-10 11:49 PM

Ran into my first big convoy of the career on the rockall bank. It had the Nelson right in the center of it. Sank her with 3 torpedoes and no trouble from the corvette escorts. I waited near her as the convoy moved away and watched her sink from the periscope. Then I paused
The game and came back to a crash to desktop.

Alpha Von Burg 08-23-10 12:44 AM

Have found another convoy with a Capitan ship in the middle, only this time, the only escorts present was the Capitan ship itself...

CherryHarbey 08-23-10 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brendan (Post 1474827)
Ran into my first big convoy of the career on the rockall bank. It had the Nelson right in the center of it. Sank her with 3 torpedoes and no trouble from the corvette escorts. I waited near her as the convoy moved away and watched her sink from the periscope. Then I paused
The game and came back to a crash to desktop.

I ran into HMS Nelson in a similar way, closer to the Irish coast. I only had two torps left so I needed to make them count. Let the escorts pass me by, came back up to periscope in between the convoy columns and gave her both torps from just over 1000m. Didn't have the guts to watch the fireworks through the periscope though, as I dived straight after firing.
No external view for me, so no screenshots I'm afraid but it sounded great on the hydrophones. Mulitple explosions, so I must have hit a magazine.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.