SUBSIM Radio Room Forums
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 20 post(s) from this thread on one page

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Quantum leap (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=170786)

DarkFish 06-08-10 01:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frau kaleun (Post 1414695)
Well, at the very least you'll do most of the wiring and help with the testing. We'll need to beam a few guys in red shirts through the system to make sure all the kinks are worked out before we put anyone's beer at risk. :O:
Sorry, I won't volunteer for that. Suppose it goes wrong and I end up someplace/sometime where they haven't got beer?
That would be horrible:o:dead:

frau kaleun 06-08-10 01:21 PM
Quote:
So:

∀t∈ℝ, ∂f∈ℕ, 0 ≤ ∂f ≤ 2: f'(t)=-f'(-t) ⇒ f'(t)+f'(-t)=0 ⇒ ∫[0,t]f'(t)dt+f(t)+∫[-t,0]f'(t)dt=f(t)

Wherein f(t) is the age of beer and f'(t) is the aging speed.

Q.E.D.
:D

Now try to prove me wrong
http://images.cheezburger.com/comple...7299387438.jpg

TLAM Strike 06-08-10 01:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkFish (Post 1414652)
yeah, that's why I'm studying Electrical Engineering:)
I hope you do understand it will be me and my colleagues who'd develop such a teleporting application?:sunny:
This is about physics, not engineering. The two are not connected. See... physics makes sense. Stuff done by Engineers as a rule makes no sense. :D

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor1 (Post 1414531)
The ansible! It works!

...sort of...
and sort of an anagram for Lesbian. Actually not sort of... :O:


Quote:
Originally Posted by frau kaleun (Post 1414599)
No because it ages backwards during transmission. Like Merlin. Because of all the quantum magicks, and stuff.
That is only if they are using Tachyons. As far as I know Tachyons have nothing to do with Quantum Entanglement. :know:

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/3237/havoce.jpg

Weiss Pinguin 06-08-10 01:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frau kaleun (Post 1414695)
Well, at the very least you'll do most of the wiring and help with the testing. We'll need to beam a few guys in red shirts through the system to make sure all the kinks are worked out before we put anyone's beer at risk. :O:
What about Admiral Archer's dog?

Oberon 06-08-10 01:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkFish (Post 1414633)
In that case it wouldn't matter a thing. If you'd get tomorrow's beer today, it would be a day younger than today's. But in the time it takes to become tomorrow's beer, it would grow a day older. 1-1=0 so there would be no difference.:hmmm:
http://picture.funnycorner.net/funny...me-paradox.jpg

Oberon 06-08-10 01:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weiss Pinguin (Post 1414754)
What about Admiral Archer's dog?
Dunno...they still haven't found him...

http://diaghilevcowboy.files.wordpre...tty_toast1.jpg

Oberon 06-08-10 01:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkFish (Post 1414724)
So:

∀t∈ℝ, ∂f∈ℕ, 0 ≤ ∂f ≤ 2: f'(t)=-f'(-t) ⇒ f'(t)+f'(-t)=0 ⇒ ∫[0,t]f'(t)dt+f(t)+∫[-t,0]f'(t)dt=f(t)

Wherein f(t) is the age of beer and f'(t) is the aging speed.

Q.E.D.
:D

Now try to prove me wrong:arrgh!:
http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__...wo_obriens.jpg

"I hate temporal mechanics!" - Miles O'Brien, past and future copies

frau kaleun 06-08-10 01:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1414751)
That is only if they are using Tachyons. As far as I know Tachyons have nothing to do with Quantum Entanglement.
If quantum entanglement is the issue, I suggest a good quantum conditioner. Reduces entanglement considerably and will also help repair any split ends on your string theories.

DarkFish 06-08-10 01:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frau kaleun (Post 1414733)
http://i525.photobucket.com/albums/c...robotsmall.jpg

Jimbuna 06-08-10 01:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkFish (Post 1414724)
So:

∀t∈ℝ, ∂f∈ℕ, 0 ≤ ∂f ≤ 2: f'(t)=-f'(-t) ⇒ f'(t)+f'(-t)=0 ⇒ ∫[0,t]f'(t)dt+f(t)+∫[-t,0]f'(t)dt=f(t)

Wherein f(t) is the age of beer and f'(t) is the aging speed.

Q.E.D.
:D

Now try to prove me wrong:arrgh!:
I've got the bugga drunk before you can convince anyone those details/figures makes sense.


http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/2884/drunkcob.gif

Oberon 06-08-10 02:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbuna (Post 1414769)
I've got the bugga drunk before you can convince anyone those details/figures makes sense.


http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/2884/drunkcob.gif
Pour us a pint while you're at it Jim, might help the headache ;)

TLAM Strike 06-08-10 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkFish (Post 1414766)
Technicaly since Optimus Prime can't function in a disassembled or partially assembled state he cannot be considered a robot. He is a form of Android.

Jimbuna 06-08-10 02:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 1414778)
Pour us a pint while you're at it Jim, might help the headache ;)
You come up north my friend and I'll see you get copious quantities of fine ale....on the old Spitfire atm


http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:f...999/downed.bmp http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:g...255B3%255D.jpg

Oberon 06-08-10 02:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbuna (Post 1414792)
You come up north my friend and I'll see you get copious quantities of fine ale....on the old Spitfire atm


http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:f...999/downed.bmp http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:g...255B3%255D.jpg
Now that, my friend, is some good stuff :yeah:

http://files.sharenator.com/Spitfire...-15482-580.jpg

DarkFish 06-08-10 02:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1414780)
Technicaly since Optimus Prime can't function in a disassembled or partially assembled state he cannot be considered a robot. He is a form of Android.
Technically, since NO robot can function in a disassembled or partially assembled state...
...your argument is invalid!:D

DarkFish 06-08-10 05:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbuna (Post 1414769)
I've got the bugga drunk before you can convince anyone those details/figures makes sense.
Oh but that doesn't matter.
I've just mathematically proven my right. That means I'm right, until you can come up with a counter example, or find an error in my prove.

The fact that the bugger's drunk now only makes it harder for him to do so:arrgh!:

Oberon 06-08-10 07:15 PM
Or pull the plug out of the wall.... :know:

Sailor Steve 06-09-10 01:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkFish (Post 1414724)
Now try to prove me wrong:arrgh!:
I've shown you logic and you refuse to see it.

I've shown you facts and you've turned a blind eye.

I've shown you reason and you continually refuse to listen.

I'm right and you're stupid.

So there.

See, I learned to argue on the internet. I cannot be defeated.

DarkFish 06-09-10 05:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve (Post 1415083)
I've shown you logic and you refuse to see it.

I've shown you facts and you've turned a blind eye.

I've shown you reason and you continually refuse to listen.

I'm right and you're stupid.

So there.

See, I learned to argue on the internet. I cannot be defeated.
For further examples of Sailor Steve's treacherous deceits and irrefutable sophisms, see his recent replies on the "I know curiosity killed the cat but..... 2010" thread.

Sailor Steve 06-09-10 11:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1414780)
Technicaly since Optimus Prime can't function in a disassembled or partially assembled state he cannot be considered a robot. He is a form of Android.
"Robots In Disguise!"

It's in the song, so it's true!

Can't hide from the truth, web-boy!
:rotfl2:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 PM.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 20 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.