SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   SH5 Mods Workshop (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=249)
-   -   [REL] Revised engine telegraph (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=164806)

Arclight 03-17-10 12:34 PM

You should join the navy then, you'll have a blast. :lol:

Highbury 03-17-10 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arclight (Post 1319586)
<snip>

Sooo...

All stop
Ahead dead slow
Ahead slow
Ahead standard
Ahead full
Ahead flank
Back dead slow
Back slow
Back full
Back emergency!

How's that? :06:

Actually that's pretty good IMO. In English we have a definite difference between a Military or Civilian engine order telegraph, but we like to re-invent the wheel in terms of language in the military, because even the most elementary things must have a "military" way of saying it lol. It appears that the ones used on U-boats would translate closer to what we consider a civilian one.

Arclight 03-18-10 05:35 AM

Aye, just gonna go with that. Seem to recall hearing "ein dritten fahrt vorauss" or something, think in SH3. That would translate to "ahead 1/3", but the last suggestion seems more in line with what we hear in SH5.

File updated, happy with it. :yep:

Sailor Steve 03-18-10 12:05 PM

The only thing I would change is the caps. Since it is a command, or an order, I would think each word should be capitalized, i.e. "Ahead Dead Slow."

Perhaps to match the "Extreme" idea, and to match the reverse, it should be "Ahead Emergency." I think that's how I'm going to do it in my SH3 setup. Of course someone has said that "Extreme" is something somebody said, and not the actual order.

Arclight 03-18-10 12:25 PM

Meh, you start a line with a capital letter, not every word. I think the rules of grammer are pretty clear on that. ;)

Besides, other lines in the text feedback don't use caps for every word either. I want any mods, whether they are my own or someone else's, to 'blend' with the game. Even the smallest detail that looks out of place can ruin the feeling imho.

It's called 'back emergency' because you use it in an emergency. 'Ahead flank' may be used simply to overtake a convoy.

Yep, I'm happy with it as it is. :sunny:

* Apart from 'back dead slow', that just sounds weird, but for lack of a better term, so it shall be.

Frederf 03-18-10 12:58 PM

Pulling from some of the better SH3 mods I would say your last setup is the best. The only one I'm unsure of is "back dead slow." In SH4 all the "backs" were kicked up a notch (missing the bottom rung) so you had:

Ahead dead slow
Ahead slow
Ahead standard
Ahead full
Ahead flank

Back slow
Back standard
Back full
Back emergency

Then again the telegraph in the picture I linked above clearly has a "Voraus Kleine Fahrt" and a "Zuruck Kleine Fahrt." The picture very strongly suggests that the "missing" entry from the backward direction is "GroBe" or full.

In which case I might do:

Ahead dead slow
Ahead slow
Ahead standard
Ahead full
Ahead flank

Back dead slow
Back slow
Back standard
Back emergency!

Also "Halbe" is "Half" so one could substitute "standard" for "half."

Arclight 03-18-10 01:28 PM

It's my interpretation that 'ahead standard' implies some special meaning, namely the best setting for long range travel. Since ships don't travel in reverse normally, I don't think there should be a 'back standard' setting.

'Ahead half' or 'back half' would be possible, but that's a strictly civilian definition again. At the moment I have a bit of a mix of military definitions ('standard', 'flank') and civillian ones ('slow', 'dead slow') ('full' seems commonplace in both). Imho it's the best balance I can get get between proper terminology and matching what is spoken in-game.

One last thing I might do is compare the engine RPM while at 'back full' setting, and see if it corresponds more closely to 'ahead standard' or 'ahead full'. :hmmm:

LukeFF 03-19-10 03:12 AM

FWIW, this is the terminology that is used in the USN Fleet Submarine Manual:

Quote:

17C4. Orders for the engines. Standard orders to the engines are given in three parts: 1) the first part designates the engine starboard, port, or all; 2) the second part indicates the direction: ahead or back; and 3) the third part indicates the speed: 1/3, 2/3, standard, full, flank, or stop. Typical orders are:
1. "Port, ahead, 2/3."
2. "Starboard, back, full."
3. "All, ahead, standard."
4. "Port, back, 1/3; Starboard, ahead, 2/3."
5. "All, stop."

Arclight 03-19-10 03:38 PM

Thanks Luke. :salute:

Coincidentaly exactly what I used for the first version, but didn't really mesh with the German voices. :)

Safe-Keeper 03-19-10 04:11 PM

Doesn't need to fit the German voices, if you ask me, if it's English, it's English.

Arclight 03-19-10 04:54 PM

Can't say I agree; disconnect between spoken and text just makes people think "that's not right, is it?" :lol:

Sailor Steve 03-19-10 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arclight (Post 1322340)
Meh, you start a line with a capital letter, not every word. I think the rules of grammer are pretty clear on that. ;)

In speech, yes, but when it's a codified order it becomes, for practical purposes, one word. It was just an idea - no need to get defensive. On the other hand you might want to review the rules of spelling. They're pretty clear, too.

Arclight 03-19-10 05:03 PM

Who's defensive now? :haha:

Only thing I ever do is try to explain my reasoning. :yep:


End spellong is nut mye strungsuit. :88)

Nor is English my native language, for that matter.

Sailor Steve 03-19-10 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arclight (Post 1324399)
Who's defensive now? :haha:

"Not I", said the fly.

Quote:

Only thing I ever do is try to explain my reasoning. :yep:
Dadgum internet doesn't give inflections again. Sorry for misunderstanding.

Arclight 03-19-10 06:47 PM

Hey, no worries. ;)

Even with a ton of smilies it's way too easy to send the wrong message. :-?



Really, I don't take myself too seriously; better to not take my posts too seriously either. :lol:

Frederf 03-19-10 08:27 PM

Even if every word capitalized is proper, it's not consistent with the rest of the buffer text. Better to match than to be textbook. Besides, German naval language of the 40s might differ from US naval language of today.

LukeFF 03-20-10 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arclight (Post 1324263)
Thanks Luke. :salute:

Coincidentaly exactly what I used for the first version, but didn't really mesh with the German voices. :)

Well, you can look at it one of two ways: one can either use the "literal" translation from German to English (which is what the devs did), or go for a more "localized" translation. Some things just don't translate "right" when translated literally from German to English. "Ahead Standard" is just one example of that.

Personally, for RFB, I'm going for more of what titles were used in the USN during the war instead of a literal translation. That means using titles like "soundman," "radioman", and the above listed engine order examples.

Arclight 03-20-10 01:09 PM

Would do the same if the aim was realism. :yep:

Would have expected something like "sonarman" or "sonaroperator", instead of "soundman". But then I'm not familiar with the official designations. :hmm2:

LukeFF 03-22-10 04:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arclight (Post 1325559)
Would have expected something like "sonarman" or "sonaroperator", instead of "soundman". But then I'm not familiar with the official designations. :hmm2:

Actually, both "soundman" and "sonarman" are correct for the WWII US Navy era. "Soundman" was the initial rating created for sonar operators (in 1942), and later on in the war (1943) it was merged into the new "Sonarman" rating.

Arclight 03-22-10 04:31 AM

Similar situation for the radioman changing to "radarman", or were those separate ratings? :06:


Maybe you can change the designation mid-game with a script. :hmmm:

Maximum accuracy, it's all in the details. :arrgh!: :lol:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.