![]() |
Haplo you make a great argument.:agree: Since being a victim of media slander and since it took over a year to be vindicated, I am the only one who can hold my head up high. Media is not held criminally responsible for anything they do. I understand the reason why the founding fathers wanted to protect the press. Yet, did they invision mass media, the invention of television, telephones and the internet and that certain media outlets could influence the citizenry better than the Nazi party and the Pravada put together? I just got back from China, when the news hit about us selling weapons to Taiwan the paper devoted at least 5 pages about the Evil Americans.....and I thought the out of sight invasive searches in Beijing airport were because I fit some terrorist profile....:rotfl2:
|
Quote:
The npr of russia. |
^^ I haz a Che t-shirt from France.
@Skipper Haplo Thank you for your perspective. A long-time friend has been trying to pry me away from the networks to seek that same level of information. :salute: |
True. My tax for fed last year was reduced by about $7/week. It has remained the same this year. I work with a small business. My wifes tax was cut last year by about $8/week. She was just raised this year to about $8/week more. She has broken even on the deal. My tax returns are completed for 2009 and our refund is about the same as we received pre Obama. I can say we made more last year than any other year. So, that would indicate there was some manipulation of the tax code. I'm not sure if it was child credit or whatever. At any rate, it is just a numbers game with smoke and mirrors.
|
Krashkart - your welcome.
For those that actually care - Fox has been caught stirring the pot with an incomplete story here on the state level. They aired a story about how 11th grade US history is having anything pre-reconstruction removed. Of course, this caused a big stink with everyone screaming about how this takes out the founding fathers, the constitution, the war of independance, the civil war, etc....Now at face value, that would rightly cause a rucus, since those are vital parts of our history that students need to learn. The reaction they wanted - which was everyone screaming that it was government trying to "rewrite" history and destroy the fabric of the nation - sure enough occured fairly loudly. But the reason you have to look into things a bit more than just trust one news source (regardless of which one) was because the story was TECHNICALLY accurate - they said nothing untrue. However, they did "neglect" to also inform the news consumer that all of this was being removed from the 11th grade - and being taught in the 10th grade instead - meaning a full 2 years of US history from founding of the nation to the modern era (ww1) which is then covered in the 12th grade. So basically the curriculem has changed to give students MORE info on the entire subject...... But did the news cover that part? No - because it wouldn't have fed a segment of the masses what they wanted. As I said earlier - every news agency does this kind of thing - and only by reasoned, deliberate personal investigation can you form a complete picture of the realities without the spin from one group or the other. @ 1480 - thanks! @ Aramike - thanks - and I guess Torvald doesn't have an answer for your question - or a rebuttal to my arguement! LOL @ AVGWarhawk - good for you man! I am glad at least someone got some benefit in getting a bit back from the government! I do think however, given everyone I have spoken with, that your not in the majority on this. But not everyone has filed as yet (I haven't) so it remains to be seen. But the end question for me is has the tax rate been LOWERED in the code anywhere - and to my knowledge that answer is no. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.