SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - Calif. School district bans 'explicite book'..

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)

- General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)

- - Calif. School district bans 'explicite book'.. (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=160784)

Quote:

Originally Posted by frau kaleun (Post 1247226)

Hmmm... lemme see... how do I explain this in a way appropriate to my delicate sensibilities?

First of all, "I" stands for "In."

"P" stands for something you would put In something else.

"V" stands for the something else you would put it In.

This configuration is generally the one that results in conception of a child, if no preventive measures have been taken.

:har: :har: :har:
Great explanation even without using terms P---- and V----- (which are medical terms BTW)

Quote:

Originally Posted by conus00 (Post 1247244)

:har: :har: :har:
Great explanation even without using terms P---- and V----- (which are medical terms BTW)

:hmmm:

Medical terms?

No, no, no, you've got it all wrong. "P" stands for "pie" and "V" stands for "vacuum cleaner."

I don't know where babies come from where you are, young man, but that's my story and I'm stickin' to it.

Now if you'll excuse me I need to find my smelling salts - I feelz a swoon comin' on.

:stare: Why are you hoovering up pies?!

Pies are lovely and sweet things, fit only for consumption by people and a
few other higher mammals*; not vacuum cleaners.

*Humans, Walrus, Urang-Utang, all marsupials and catfish (I know they arn't mammals).

Do you want to discriminate vacuum cleaners by denying them pie?:down:
They have feelings too!
You could get sued for that.;)

:D
Thread successfully derailed....

But conus00 is spot on: why do we (and I mean we Europeans too) always want to please the minority even if it pi**es of the majority and doesn't make any sense at all?:doh:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Letum (Post 1247268)

:stare: Why are you hoovering up pies?!

Pies are lovely and sweet things

Tell that to AVGWarhawk's crew. He's making 'em out of seagulls and I'm afraid to ask what else.

The pie is a lie :03:

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteamWake (Post 1247314)

The pie is a lie

THE PIE IS NOT A LIE!
YOU WILL TAKE THAT BACK NOW!

The pie is real.
The pie is real.
The pie is real.
The pie is real.
The pie is real.

/clutches self and rocks back and forth.

There is no pie. There is only Zuul.

Quote:

Originally Posted by frau kaleun (Post 1247357)

There is no pie. There is only Zuul.

http://capperwiki.com/wiki/images/3/3a/Zuul.jpg http://www.blogcdn.com/nintendo.joys...zuul043008.jpg

Quote:

Hmmm.

Why is "oral sex" in any dictionary?
I don't ask this due to the implications, but because "oral sex" is 2 words.
A dictionary is supposed to define 1 word at a time. It should have defined "oral", and it should have defined "sex". It should not have combined 2 words, and given a definition.

Oddly enough, Websters is at the top of my s__t list, because they don't list, what seems like, half of the words in the english language. Unless of course, you say them in french, then the same word is quite acceptable?!

The only english language dictionary I use is The New Oxford American Dictionary, which comes from England. (Thank you England, for a non-PC, REAL dictionary, with ALL the words!)
Prior to finding that I had to look up words in a english/danish dictionary. I highly recommend it.

Can you look in the oxford dictionary, see if you can read the definition for "oral history" that is written.
You may notice its two words defined in a "REAL" dictionary.
You may also notice that the "REAL" dictionary contains the oral sex definition.

As for the story, no surprise, its just the fundy nuts at work on education again.
If they are allowed to rewrite text books on science or history why shouldn't they be allowed to rewrite the dictionary too.