Well, in the US you're not legally allowed to go to Cuba for anything, so I'm not surprised that you don't think of it.

I'm not saying Cuba is a model nation for healthcare, I'm echoing what Max147 is saying, that many people travel to Cuba for healthcare, mostly from latin America.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care_in_Cuba

Well when compared to other countries in Latin America I suppose that Cuba is a shining bastion of modern healthcare. As opposed to say Hati :up:

Higher life expectancy and lower infant mortality than the US. Just sayin;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_...ionary_indices

And I wouldn't want to live in or participate in the health care systems of either Canada or Cuba. Just sayin....

And from practical experience, most of my fellow Americans seem to agree as they aren't exactly rushing your borders for health care. It's actually quite the opposite.

Reminds me of what a reporter said after the Savings and Loan Scandal.

"why should the taxpayer pay for the bailout, let the federal government pay for it" :damn:

The US healthcare system is great - if you can pay for all of it.

People who travel abroad for medical care generally fly first class or take their own private jets. For those people, the US is generally the best option. Americans who are rich enough to travel abroad for healthcare can usually afford the best care here, so they don't need to travel.

The people who get screwed by the American healthcare system are those who can't afford to travel abroad for care. Those people would be better off under a European-style system, but they can't afford to go to Europe for healthcare.

That said, I have plenty of friends who have been in countries with socialized medicine for other reasons, and had to use their systems. All of them have raved about the quality of care and the low cost.

In countries with single payer systems there is still the option for private insurance for those who can afford it. But the public option is so good that almost nobody uses the private option.

This. There is truth in the above statement.

Perhaps you should visit the wider world for a look.

There is a limit placed on the number of US doctors who are allowed to get their training in Cuba.
If I recall correctly its only 200 doctors a year.

More and more US companies are providing their employees with foriegn health treatment as part of their cover , its cheaper than using the current expensive bloated system in the States.

Numbers don't back that up , a single Asian hospitals yearly intake of US health tourists manages to nearly equal the the entire number of health tourist the US recieves.

I realize every country has their success stories and their horror stories when it comes to health care. What vibes I'm getting are few but probably a concern of most.

1. Enough doctors and general practioners for all?
2. Doctors call the shots or a pencil pusher in DC?
3. If you do not pay into the system do you still get the health care benefits? (that right there is my biggest issue, free ride crap needs to stop)
4. ref #3, illegals get a piece of the action?

These are my concerns. Any others that might want to chime in?

My best friend who went with new wife to visit inlaws in Netherlands had a back injury there and a inlaw relation took him to her local Dr. They fixed him up no charge.

The system work then. 80's :woot:

Not a chance here.

Well one of the problems today is that doctors don't call the shots now. Some for-profit insurance company minion who is only interested in profit calls the shots.

Whether we have the current insurance coverage, or some federal program, the result will be the same. Doctors still not calling the shots and some nameless minion who has no care or concern about health making the rules. :nope:

As it applies to Estonia.
1. Yes
2. Doctors
3. No
4. Only first aid is provided for everyone.

Well, that is fine Anti however, if I pay for private insurance I should be exempt from paying via taxes for this univeral health care plan. It is as simple as that.

That is fair ennough, can't say that I disagree with that.

Sadly, I will have to agree with it if Obama gets his way. Time will tell. I have noticed quite a few town meetings on healthcare are turning into hell night.

Looks like something the USA should lookat maybe.

Good Post Anti. :up:

Yea, maybe - I'd tell ya to look at your wallet FIRST and watch out for our Marxist Brother:

http://learnabit.homeserver.com/lab/...you_wallet.wmv

Who's in YOUR wallet?

So if I think the F-22 is a bad idea, does that mean I shouldn't have to pay for it?

Why not everybody else do's . :haha:when I want to demo a sim purchase.

Yes. You should have to pay for it. F-22 and other combat systems are common use items, and benefit citizens of the nation equally through common national defense. Although, some of us pay alot more into F-22 than others. hmmph.Your healthcare is not a common use item. It is your personal responsibility. It is regrettable if you don't make wise choices in your personal health, but it doesn't affect my life as an individual of this nation in any way to the outcome. Harsh but true. The social contract between government and citizen is reasonable taxation for common use items. Not government soaking citizens as ATM machines to pay for things that people should be paying for themselves.